Search Results for "Land encroachment"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against Admission of Insolvenc...
Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against NCLT Order Admitting I...

Search Results for "Land encroachment"

786 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 786 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Removal of Encroachment on Patta Land — Pre-Existing Mud Road Not an Encroachment as It Existed Prior to Petitioner's Purchase and Was Laid with Consent of Original Owner.

26 Mar 2026

The petitioners, Gurusamy and Veeraraian Muthuvel, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking a writ of mandamus to ...

High Court

Madras High Court Quashes Government Orders Reclassifying Land as Government Tharisu in Land Ceiling Proceedings — Failure to Provide Notice and Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court set aside G.O. (ms) No.215 dated 02.05.2025 and G.O. (ms) No.223 dated 05.05.2025 under the Tamil Nadu Land Reforms (Fixation of Ceiling on Land) Act, 1961, and remanded for fresh consideration after hearing the petitioners.

17 Feb 2026

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by petitioners K. Jagadeeswaran and J. Haripriya (in WP No. 18891 of 2025) and R. Regina (in WP No. 124...

High Court

Madras High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Notice Under Tamil Nadu Land Encroachment Act, 1905 — Non-Speaking Final Notice Held Valid as No Adjudication Required at Section 6 Stage. Petitioners Failed to Exhaust Statutory Appeal Remedy Under Section 10 of the Act.

19 Jan 2026

The petitioners, Karupayee and Thangamani, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Madras High Court challengi...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Seeking Regularization of Unauthorized Buildings in Navi Mumbai — Section 52A MRTP Act Does Not Apply to Lands Acquired for Public Purpose and Belonging to Planning Authority. The court held that the compounding provision under Section 52A of the MRTP Act, 1966 is not applicable to unauthorized constructions on lands acquired for public purpose and vested in the Planning Authority.

14 Aug 2018

The petitioners were residents of buildings constructed without development permission on lands acquired by the State Government for the satellite cit...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes FIR Against Public Servants in Land Revenue Act Case — No Sanction Required Under Section 197 CrPC for Acts Done in Official Duty. Allegations of Fabrication of Records Under Section 192A of Karnataka Land Revenue Act, 1964 Do Not Attract Criminal Liability Without Prior Sanction.

17 Mar 2015

The judgment pertains to four connected petitions filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) seeking quashing of FIR No.18...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Town Municipal Council in Land Acquisition Dispute — Plaintiff's Suit for Declaration and Possession Dismissed for Lack of Title and Limitation. The court held that acquisition under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 extinguishes prior title and the plaintiff failed to prove possession within limitation.

3 Jul 2014

The appeal arises from a suit filed by the original plaintiff (since deceased, represented by LRs) against the Town Municipal Council, Sindagi, and St...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute, Holds That Plaint Description and Map Sufficient Under Order VII Rule 3 CPC. The court restored the trial court's decree for removal of encroachment and possession, finding that the first appellate court erred in reversing on technical grounds.

25 Apr 2014

The case involves a second appeal arising from a property dispute. The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a suit for removal of encroachment and possession...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Commissioner Appointment in Property Suit. Court Commissioner Not Appointed When Dispute Involves Title and Possession, Not Measurement.

14 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Kolhapuri Bandu Lakade, filed a suit (Regular Civil Suit No.513 of 2007) for declaration and restoration of possession against the res...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Grant Decree Due to Lack of Continuous Readiness and Willingness. Court holds that under Section 20 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, the court has discretion to refuse specific performance where plaintiff fails to prove readiness and willingness from date of contract to date of decree.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves two first appeals filed by Veljiben V. Satra and Nitin V. Satra (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 30/06/2016 passed...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Transit Fee Levy on Forest Produce Under Section 41 of Indian Forest Act, 1927. High Court Judgments on Transit Fee Rules Challenged in Batch of Appeals from Uttarakhand, Uttar Pradesh, and Madhya Pradesh.

1 Jan 1970

This batch of cases before the Supreme Court arose from multiple writ petitions challenging the levy of transit fee on forest produce imposed by the S...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)