Search Results for "Full Bench Decision"

7714 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 7714 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Examines Whether Amended Section 6 of Hindu Succession Act, 1956 Operates Retrospectively. The Correctness of the Division Bench Decision in Vaishali Satish Ganorkar Holding Prospective Operation is Challenged, with Parties Citing Supreme Court Precedents.

This matter comprises a batch of second appeals before the Bombay High Court, Civil Appellate Jurisdiction, presided over by Justice R.G. Ketkar. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of IT Rules Amendment on Fake News in Reference Opinion — Rule 3(1)(b)(v) of IT Rules, 2021 Held Not Violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), 19(1)(g) of Constitution and Section 79 of IT Act, 2000.

The present proceedings arise from a reference made under Chapter-I Rule 7 of the Bombay High Court Appellate Side Rules, 1960 read with Section 98 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Termination of Temporary Employee for Misconduct Without Inquiry. Termination Order Found to be a Camouflage for Punishment; Reinstatement with 50% Back Wages Ordered Under Service Law.

The petitioner, an Accountant appointed on temporary basis in the Town Municipal Council, Badami, was terminated from service on 27-07-2018. She had b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Stay in No Confidence Motion Case — No Fresh Motion Barred Under Section 35(3-A) of Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 as First Motion Was Not Moved or Carried.

The appellant, Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale, was elected Sarpanch of Theur village panchayat in 2010. On 5 October 2011, a no confidence motion was init...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Considers Whether Lift Installation Contracts Are 'Works Contract' or 'Sale of Goods' for Sales Tax Purposes. The Matter Was Referred to a Larger Bench to Resolve Conflict Between Prior Rulings and to Determine the Applicability of the Predominant Intention Test After Recent Judgments.

The matter stems from multiple writ petitions and civil appeals challenging the classification of contracts for manufacture, supply and installation o...