Search Results for "Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...
Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Motor Accident Claim Case — Death Not Arising O...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Arbitral Award in Commerci...

Search Results for "Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal"

462 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 462 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Injunction Suit — Rejection of Plaint Set Aside. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation Under Order VII Rule 11(d) CPC.

26 Jul 2024

The appellant, M/s. Shree Garodi Steels, filed a suit for permanent injunction against the respondent, M/s. Yojaka India Private Ltd., in O.S. No. 739...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Bank and Employees in Loan Dispute — Dispute Held Purely Civil, No Prima Facie Case of Cheating or Criminal Breach of Trust. Allegations of Forgery and Use of Forged Documents Also Not Made Out, FIR Quashed Under Section 482 CrPC.

2 Aug 2022

The judgment arises from two writ petitions filed by ICICI Bank Ltd., its employees (Zarin Daruwala, Girish Nayak, Arati Ramakrishnan, Vipul Parmar, K...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Liquidator's Appeal on Limitation Grounds in Insolvency Proceeding. Limitation period under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 runs from the date the order is made available, not from pronouncement, applying Section 420(3) of the Companies Act, 2013 and Rule 50 of the National Company Law Tribunal Rules, 2016 for free copies.

22 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the National Company Law Appellate Tribunal (NCLAT) dated 13 July 2020, which dismissed the appellant's appeal as ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Guarantors' Waiver of Pre-deposit in Debt Recovery Appeal — Section 21 of RDB Act Does Not Mandate Pre-deposit for Guarantors When Principal Debtor Has Already Deposited Substantial Amount. The court held that the DRAT's discretion under Section 21 must be exercised judiciously, and since the principal debtor deposited Rs. 1.5 crores, the guarantors' appeal should not require additional pre-deposit.

29 Jun 2017

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by guarantors (Mr. Jaisingrao Ghodke and Smt. Nalini Jadhav) challenging an order dated 4/5/2017 passed...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSFC's Petition Challenging DRAT Order Granting Cross-Examination in Loan Recovery Case. Right to Cross-Examine Affidavit Deponent Is a Valuable Right Not Barred by Rule 12(6) of DRT Procedure Rules.

2 Apr 2016

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Financial Corporation (MSFC), filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challeng...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging DRAT Order in Debt Recovery Matter — Maintainability of Appeal Under Section 18 of RDDBFI Act, 1993. The court held that an appeal against an interim order under Section 17 of the Act is maintainable before the Debts Recovery Appellate Tribunal under Section 18, and the Tribunal's order refusing to waive pre-deposit was not perverse or without jurisdiction.

23 Jun 2014

The petitioners, M/s. IDEB Projects Pvt Ltd and others, filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

6 May 2014

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Award of Damages for Unauthorized Share Transactions. Court holds that arbitral tribunal's findings on unauthorized trades and liability of broker are not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jul 2013

The petitioner, Kotak Securities Limited, a registered stock broker, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 c...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs DRT to Deliver Judgment Within Four Weeks in Recovery Appeal — Delay in Pronouncement After Hearing Concluded Held Unjustified. Presiding Officer of Debts Recovery Tribunal repeatedly adjourned pronouncement of judgment for over six months after hearing concluded, amounting to failure to exercise jurisdiction under Section 30 of Recovery of Debts Due to Banks and Financial Institutions Act, 1993.

22 Nov 2011

The Petitioner, International Asset Reconstruction Company Pvt. Ltd., had filed an application for sale of immovable property mortgaged in its favour ...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)