Search Results for "CESTAT order"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "CESTAT order"

330 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 330 result(s)

High Court

Madras High Court Allows CENVAT Credit Claim for Furnace Oil Used in Manufacturing Intermediate Non-Dutiable Product. Furnace oil used to produce Dead Burnt Magnesite (DBM) held to be 'input' for final excisable goods under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2001, as DBM is an intermediate product essential for manufacture of final goods.

25 Jun 2026

The appellant, M/s. Tata Refractories Ltd. (now TRL Krosaki Refractories Limited), is an assessee under the Central Excise Act, 1944. It manufactures ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes SVLDRS-3 Form Demanding Arrears Under Sabka Vishwas Scheme Due to Non-Application of Mind by Designated Committee. Petitioner's Declaration Under Dispute Category Wrongly Treated as Arrears Category Without Considering Relevant Material.

2 Dec 2025

The petitioner, M/s. Unique Enterprises, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging form SVLDRS-3 issued under t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Confiscation of Souza and Padamsee Artworks as Obscene — Customs Officer's Personal Opinion Insufficient to Brand Art as Obscene Under Section 11 Customs Act, 1962. Artistic merit and community standards must be considered before declaring artworks obscene.

25 Oct 2024

The petitioner, M/s. B. K. Polimex India Private Limited, imported seven artworks by world-renowned artists F.N. Souza and Akbar Padamsee from London ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Examines Taxability of Solatium Component in Land Acquisition Compensation Under GST. Issue Concerns Whether Receipt of Solatium Constitutes a Service Under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II to CGST Act, 2017 or Falls Under Exempt Transfer of Land.

10 Sep 2024

The case comprised a batch of five writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Sabka Vishwas Scheme Case — Directs Reconsideration of Declaration by Allowing Pre-deposit Adjustment. The Court held that rejection of declaration under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 on ground of non-reflection of pre-deposit in electronic ledger was unjustified and directed reconsideration.

28 Jan 2021

The petitioner, M/s. Code Engineers Private Limited, a company engaged in providing erection, commissioning and installation services, was registered ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Suspension of Customs Broker License for Violation of Natural Justice — Ex-Parte Order Without Show Cause Notice Set Aside. The court held that suspension under Regulation 23 of CBLR, 2013 without affording opportunity of hearing is illegal and directed fresh consideration after show cause notice.

21 Nov 2017

The petitioner, M/s Capricorn Logistics Pvt. Ltd., a Customs Broker, challenged an order dated 13.11.2017 passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Banga...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Customs Interest Refund Case — Interest Under Section 27A Payable from Date of Payment of Duty. The court held that the doctrine of unjust enrichment does not apply to interest under Section 27A of the Customs Act, 1962, and interest is payable from the date of payment of duty.

13 Aug 2015

The appeal was filed by the Commissioner of Customs, Bangalore, against the order of the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) d...

High Court

High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Assessee Passed on Duty Incidence to Customers, Refund Claim Rejected. Section 12B of Central Excise Act, 1944 bars refund if duty burden shifted to others.

26 Aug 2013

The appellant, M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing passenger utility vehicles and parts thereof, which are excisable under C...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition in Central Excise Rebate Case — By-Product Export Rebate Allowed. Input Credit Adjustment Permitted Under CENVAT Credit Rules, 2004 for Duty Paid on Inputs Used in Manufacture of Final Product, Even if By-Product is Not Manufactured.

6 Apr 2011

The Union of India, through the Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Joint Secretary (Revision Ap...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Predeposit Order in Central Excise Exemption Dispute — Supply to Navy Through IOCL Not a Bar to Exemption. Tribunal Directed to Decide Appeal on Merits Without Predeposit as Petitioner Made Out a Prima Facie Case on Interpretation of Exemption Notification No.64/95-CE.

13 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Limited (HPCL), a government company, filed a writ petition challenging an order of the Customs, Excis...

20 21 22 23 24

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)