WRIT PETITION NO. 10475 OF 2011
7 Mar 2012The case involved a partnership firm (Petitioner) engaged in manufacturing soft gelatin pharmaceutical products, and a US corporation (Respondent No.1...
Search Results for "Bombay Civil Service Rules"
5212 result(s) found
Found 5212 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay Dismisses Appeals by Bank in Securitisation Act Case Regarding Maintainability of Civil Suits — The Court Examines Whether Plaints Against Bank Are Barred Under Section 34 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.
26 Oct 2018The litigation arose from a batch of five civil suits filed by several plaintiffs against M/s. Orbit Corporation Ltd. and Axis Bank Limited, concernin...
- 42
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Regrant of Watan Land Under Maharashtra Pargana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950 — Petitioner Lacks Locus Standi and Petition Barred by Delay. The court held that a subsequent purchaser cannot challenge a regrant order passed before his purchase, and the petition filed after 9 years is grossly delayed.
3 Jan 2024The petitioner, Arvind Balaji Walvekar, filed a writ petition challenging the order dated 25 August 2009 passed by the Minister (Revenue) rejecting hi...
- 58
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Company Petition — Interim Relief Granted to Restrain Alienation of Property. Balance of convenience favored grant of ad-interim relief to protect subject matter of petition under Sections 397, 398 of Companies Act, 1956.
1 Jan 2025The present appeal arises from a Company Petition No. 149 of 2012 filed under Sections 397 and 398 of the Companies Act, 1956, alleging oppression and...
- 113
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Dispute, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Suit for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.
6 Feb 2024The case involves two second appeals arising from a property dispute between family members. The appellants in SA-284-2019 were the original defendant...
- 46
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Directs Timely Filling of Vacancies in Information Commissions to Ensure Effective Implementation of Right to Information Act, 2005. The Court held that the right to information is a fundamental right under Article 19(1)(a) and that vacancies in Information Commissions must be filled promptly to prevent backlogs and ensure transparency.
15 Feb 2019This Public Interest Litigation was filed under Article 32 of the Constitution of India seeking effective implementation of the Right to Information A...
- 302
High Court
Division Bench of Bombay High Court Hears Appeals from Single Judge Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Summary Suit. Ex-Parte Decree Passed in Diamond Supply Suit Under Order XXXVII CPC After Defendants Failed to Comply with Conditional Deposit Order.
27 Feb 2017The dispute arose from a summary suit filed by Sailam BVBA, a Belgian partnership firm, against Helios Jewellery Pvt Ltd (Defendant No.1) and its four...
- 31
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeals in RERA Execution Case, Holding Order XXI Rule 32(5) CPC Applicable. The court set aside the Appellate Tribunal's order disallowing amendment to execution applications seeking construction by decree holders at promoter's cost.
24 Jun 2026The case involves five second appeals filed by allottees (Rajan Chandiramani, Jagruti Parikh and Anr., Priyanka Waghela, Srichand Makhija, and Jayesh ...
- 120
High Court
Bombay High Court Adjudges Writ Petition in Civil Suit Alleging Advocate's Fraud. Withdrawal of Suit Without Plaintiff's Instructions Examined Under Order XXIII, Rule 1 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908
3 Dec 2013The petitioner entered into an agreement of sale dated 6.7.2005 for purchase of agricultural land from respondent nos. 2 and 3 for Rs.15,00,000/-, pay...
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Interprets Time Limits for Awards Under Land Acquisition Laws in Appeal Against High Court Ruling on Lapse of Proceedings. The Court Examines Whether the Two-Year Period Under Section 11A of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Applies Post-Repeal or the Twelve-Month Period Under Section 25 of the Right to Fair Compensation and Transparency in Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation and Resettlement Act, 2013 Governs Awards Under Section 24(1)(a).
10 Nov 2021The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Maharashtra for the Gosikhurd Project. On 16th June 2011, a notification...
- 464
