Search Results for "writ petition premature"

955 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 955 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Resurrects Issue of Mandatory Naval NOC in Development Near Defence Establishments. The Court Examines Validity of Stop Work Notice and Deemed Commencement Certificate Under DCPR 2034, Citing Precedents and Regulatory Vacuum.

The writ petition was filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the stop work notice dated 24 October 2025 issued by MHADA and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petition Seeking Refund of Customs Duty on Non-Delivered Goods. Importer's Refund Claim Rejected by Customs Authority Due to Inter-Departmental Dispute over Liability, Sections 13, 23, 27A of Customs Act, 1962 Involved.

The petitioner, a company manufacturing PVC/CPVC pipes, imported 100 metric tons of Polyvinyl Chloride Resin SG-5 Erdos. It filed Bill of Entry No. 84...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Examines Taxability of Solatium Component in Land Acquisition Compensation Under GST. Issue Concerns Whether Receipt of Solatium Constitutes a Service Under Entry 5(e) of Schedule II to CGST Act, 2017 or Falls Under Exempt Transfer of Land.

The case comprised a batch of five writ petitions filed before the High Court of Karnataka under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union's Challenge to Tribunal Order Refusing to Treat Company's Closure Application as Withdrawn. Held that the Tribunal's refusal was not perverse and the Union's application was premature under Section 25-O of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The judgment concerns two writ petitions filed by the General Motors Employees Union challenging an order of the Industrial Tribunal dated 28.04.2023 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Writ Petition for Premature Release Consideration Under 2018 Policy Despite Subsequent Amendment. Court Holds That Policy Prevalent at Time of Conviction Governs Remission Consideration and Directs State to Re-examine Arbitrary Age Restriction in 2021 Policy.

The petitioner, convicted for offences under Section 302/307/323/34 of the Indian Penal Code and sentenced to life imprisonment by judgment dated 30.9...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging 30-Year Imprisonment Order for Life Convict Under Remission Guidelines. Classification of convicts under 1992 and 2010 Guidelines for premature release held valid and not arbitrary.

The petitioner, Amit s/o Gajanan Gandhi, a life convict undergoing imprisonment in Central Prison, Nagpur, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Articl...