Search Results for "withholding compensation"

214 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 214 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Commercial Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The Appeal Questions the Upholding of Arbitral Award Granting Remuneration and Indemnity Under Reconstitution Deed of Partnership Firm.

The present Commercial Appeal under Section 13(1A) of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 read with Section 37(1)(c) of the Arbitration and Conciliation A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Title and Adverse Possession. Court holds that dismissal of restitution application under Section 144(1) CPC does not bar a fresh suit for possession based on independent title.

The case involves a property dispute over a house and land at Survey No. 123, Block No. 276, village Atyal, taluka Gadhinglaj. The respondents (origin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging APMC Market Fee Exemption for Farmers. Exemption notification under Section 63 of Karnataka APMC Act, 1966 held valid and not violative of Article 14.

The petitioners, who are traders and commission agents in the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) yard at Tiptur, filed a Public Interest Lit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Debarment of Retired CCI Officials from Legal Practice. Petition lacks bonafide public interest and is motivated by personal vendetta.

The petitioner, Dr. Savio Pereira, filed a writ petition purportedly as a public interest litigation before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses PIL Seeking Debarment of Retired CCI Officials from Legal Practice — No Cause of Action or Public Interest Established. Petition fails to demonstrate any legal right or public injury warranting interference under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Dr. Savio Pereira, filed a writ petition purportedly as a public interest litigation before the High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru. ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Possession Claim by Lessee in Company Liquidation — Official Liquidator Directed to Hand Over Property Subject to Lease. Leasehold Rights Survive Winding Up and Official Liquidator Must Respect Lessee's Right to Possession Under Section 456 of Companies Act, 1956.

The Provident Investment Company Ltd., a Government of Madhya Pradesh undertaking, filed an application seeking possession of leasehold land admeasuri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Freedom Fighter Pension for Alleged Participation in Quit India Movement. Petitioners failed to provide contemporaneous documentary evidence of participation in freedom struggle as required under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1980.

The judgment pertains to a writ petition filed by 14 individuals seeking freedom fighter pension under the Swatantrata Sainik Samman Pension Scheme, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Review Petition in SC/ST Land Grant Case — No Error Apparent on Record. Review Petition against order in Writ Petition No.7988/2002 dismissed as the petitioner failed to establish any error apparent on the face of the record or grounds for review under Order 47 Rule 1 CPC.

The case arises from a review petition filed against the order dated 17.06.2013 in Writ Petition No.7988/2002. The original writ petition involved a d...