CMA(PT).No.46 of 2024
18 Mar 2025Background: This is an appeal filed under Section 117-A of the Patents Act, 1970 by the applicant against the order of the Controller of Patents rejec...
Search Results for "state monopoly"
238 result(s) found
Found 238 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Patent and Trademark Infringement Case — Finds No Prima Facie Case for Injunction. Court holds that patent for method and apparatus does not extend to product, and trademark registration is subject to opposition, thus no interim injunction warranted.
29 Mar 2010The appeal arises from an order dated 19.11.2009 in Notice of Motion No.3709 of 2009 in Suit No.2576 of 2009, whereby the trial court granted an inter...
- 63
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction Against Trademark Infringement and Passing Off in 'MARINE' Mark Dispute. Plaintiff's registered trademarks for adhesives and sealants protected against defendant's use of identical mark for similar goods.
13 Jan 2014The plaintiff, Pidilite Industries Limited, filed a suit against Jubilant Agri & Consumer Products Limited alleging infringement of its registered tra...
- 123
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 307, 148, 323, 504, 144 read with 149 IPC set aside due to material contradictions and lack of credible evidence.
5 Sep 2022The complainant, Sri D Reddeppa, filed a criminal appeal under Section 372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) against the judgment and ord...
- 143
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Rash Driving Causing Death and Injuries Under Section 304-A IPC. Accused's Appeal Dismissed as Evidence of Rash and Negligent Driving Was Sufficiently Established.
18 Aug 2006The applicant, Shri Mahadeo Pandurang Phadtare, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 304-A, 338, 427 of the Indian Penal Code ...
- 43
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Interlocutory Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'CHERI' vs 'MULTI CHERRY' — Preliminary Issue Under Section 9A CPC Pending. The court declined to hear the ad-interim application due to procedural bars: the Appeal Court's order in the Clause XIV leave appeal and the Defendants' application for a preliminary issue on jurisdiction under Section 9A CPC.
24 Jun 2015The Plaintiffs, Indchemie Health Specialties Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit for trademark infringement and passing off against Intas Pharmaceuticals Ltd. and...
- 97
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement Suit Over 'Café Madras' Restaurant Name. The mark 'Café Madras' held to be inherently distinctive and entitled to protection against use by a subsequent restaurant of the same name.
11 Mar 2015The plaintiffs, the Kamath family, have been running a restaurant named 'Café Madras' in Matunga, Mumbai since 1938. The restaurant has acquired a re...
- 124
High Court
Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Trademark Infringement and Passing Off Suit — Petrofer Chemie and Hardcastle Petrofer v. United Petrofer Limited. Use of identical mark 'PETROFER' by defendant for similar industrial chemicals constitutes prima facie infringement under Section 29 of the Trade Marks Act, 1999.
6 Nov 2025The plaintiffs, Petrofer Chemie H.R. Fischer GMBH & Co. KG (a German company) and Hardcastle Petrofer Private Limited (an Indian company), filed a com...
- 103
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging BCCI Disciplinary Committee's Refusal to Recuse Members. Natural Justice Requires Impartial Adjudication; Bias Allegations Against Committee Members Must Be Examined.
15 Sep 2010The petitioner, Lalit Kumar Modi, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 11th August 2010 of ...
- 74
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Plaintiff's Interim Injunction Application in Trademark Infringement Suit Over Descriptive Mark 'OCTRIDE'. Court holds that the mark is descriptive of the active ingredient Octreotide and lacks distinctiveness, and balance of convenience favors the defendant.
4 May 2026The plaintiff, Sun Pharma Laboratories Limited, filed a commercial IP suit seeking an interim injunction to restrain the defendant, United Biotech Pri...
- 158
