Search Results for "revenue mutation"

885 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 885 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Revenue Authorities for Failing to Execute Decree Despite Supreme Court Confirmation. Court Directs Tahsildar to Execute Decree Within Six Weeks, Imposes Costs for Vexatious Litigation.

The petitioner, Gangabai Ramrao Patil, entered into an agreement to sell land with the respondents in 1973. When the respondents failed to execute the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 7 and Section 13(1)(d) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Subhash s/o Narayanraoji Rathod, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Wardha, in Special Case No. 4/1997 for offences under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Letters Patent Appeal by Purchaser of Tenanted Agricultural Land Against Order Setting Aside Mutation Entry. Mutation Entries Do Not Confer Title and Purchaser Cannot Claim Rights Without Adjudication Under Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948.

The appellant, M/s. S. Kumar Developers and Builders, purchased agricultural land that was tenanted. The appellant obtained mutation entries in the re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Mutation Entry in Property Dispute — No Interference Under Article 227 as Civil Suit Already Pending for Adjudication of Title. Mutation Entry Does Not Confer Title; Dispute Must Be Decided by Civil Court.

The case involves a property dispute between the petitioners and respondents over mutation entries in revenue records. The petitioners, legal heirs of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Tenant's Purchase Rights Under Bombay Tenancy Act. Will Deed Cannot Override Statutory Tenancy Rights as Tenant's Status on Tillers' Day is Determinative Under Section 32G.

The case involves a dispute over agricultural lands in Village Talabid, taluka Karad, district Satara. The original owner, Shamu Vithu Chavan, was a l...