Search Results for "reopen assessment"

386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices in Income Tax Case Due to Lack of Independent Application of Mind by AO. Dividend Stripping Provision Under Section 94(7) of Income Tax Act, 1961 Not Applicable Where Assessee Suffered Net Loss on Sale of Mutual Fund Units Exceeding Dividend Received.

The petitioner, Karan Maheshwari, an individual investor in shares, stocks, securities, and mutual funds, challenged a show cause notice dated 20 Augu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 148 of Income Tax Act, 1961 for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion Without New Tangible Material is Invalid.

The petitioner, Everest Kanto Cylinder Ltd., a public limited company, filed its return of income for Assessment Year 2016-17 on 30 November 2015. The...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Against Charitable Trust for Lack of Fresh Material. Reopening Beyond Four Years Invalid as No Failure to Disclose Material Facts Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act, 1961.

The petitioner, Framji Dinshaw Petit Parsee Sanatorium, is a public charitable trust registered under section 12A of the Income Tax Act, 1961. For the...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notice Under Section 147 of Income Tax Act for Lack of Reasons — Reopening Based on Mere Change of Opinion Invalid. Failure to Communicate Reasons for Reopening Violates Principles of Natural Justice and Renders Notice Invalid.

The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by M/s. Velingkar Brothers, a partnership firm registered under the Partnership Act, 1932, challengi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petitions in KVAT Act Case — Joint Commissioner Had Jurisdiction to Invoke Suo Moto Revision Under Section 63-A. Purchases from Composition Dealers Not Deductible from Contract Receipts for Taxable Turnover.

The case involves revision petitions filed by M/S JMC Projects (India) Ltd. against the State of Karnataka under Section 65(1) of the Karnataka Value ...