High Court of Karnataka Hears Batch of Writ Petitions by Bar/Restaurant Licensees Against Non-Renewal of CL-9 Excise Licenses. Petitions Challenge Communications Issued by Excise Authorities and Seek Directions to Renew Licenses.
22 Aug 2017...
Search Results for "order set aside"
31275 result(s) found
Found 31275 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Jurisdiction in Transfer Dispute Under MRTU & PULP Act — Issuance of Transfer Order at Mumbai Confers Jurisdiction. Transfer order issued at Mumbai to employee posted in Rajasthan held to confer jurisdiction on Industrial Court at Mumbai under Section 28 of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.
19 Sep 2025The petition was filed by Raptakos Brett & Co. Ltd., a pharmaceutical company, challenging an order of the Industrial Court at Mumbai dated 4 May 2022...
- 16
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal of Bank Employee in Disciplinary Matter — Upholds Validity of Enquiry Proceedings Despite Delay. The court held that the disciplinary authority's decision to impose penalty of dismissal was not vitiated by delay in framing charges or by the enquiry officer's failure to consider defence documents, as the employee had ample opportunity to participate.
17 Jun 2016The appellant, Sri K. P. Narayanan Kutty, was an officer of the State Bank of India who joined service in 1964. While working as Branch Manager at Shi...
- 117
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Stay on Interest Demand in MVAT Case — Tribunal Erred in Treating Composite Order as Non-Appealable Under Section 30(2). The court held that an appellate order confirming interest under Section 30(2) of the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002, when part of a composite assessment order, is appealable and stay can be granted.
6 Jun 2023The petitioner, S. K. Trading Co., filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 30 Septemb...
- 98
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court's Review Order in Mutation Dispute — Review Power Cannot Be Used to Rehear Merits After Dismissal of SLP. The High Court's review order was set aside as it sought to re-examine the merits after the Supreme Court had dismissed the SLP against the original judgment, and the contempt petition was barred by limitation.
1 Jan 2024The present appeals arise from a long-standing property dispute concerning land known as 'Asman Jahi Paigah' in Raidurg village. The original suit for...
- 550
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Writ Petitions Against CCI's Investigation Order in Competition Act Case. Broadcasters Challenge Order Under Section 26(1) Alleging Lack of Jurisdiction and Non-Application of Mind.
16 Oct 2019Star India Private Limited and Sony Pictures Network India Private Limited filed writ petitions challenging an order dated 27 July 2018 passed by the ...
- 22
High Court
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Contempt Appeal, Sets Aside Conviction for Willful Disobedience of Court Order in Land Dispute. Appellants Held Not Guilty of Contempt as Order Was Ambiguous and Compliance Was Not Willfully Disobeyed.
22 Jul 2010The case arises from a contempt appeal under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, filed by Tejram, Laxman, and Ramu Hazare (appellants) aga...
- 82
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Blanket Prohibitory Order Under Section 144 CrPC in Bengaluru, Holds It Violative of Articles 19(1)(a) and 19(1)(b); Order Cancelling Protest Permissions Against CAA Struck Down as District Magistrate Failed to Apply Mind and Provide Material Facts.
13 Feb 2020The High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ petitions challenging an order dated 18 December 2019 issued by the District Magistrate-cum-Commissi...
- 29
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Over Succession and Title — Upholds Trial Court's Finding That Plaintiff Failed to Prove Ownership. Succession Certificate Not Conclusive Proof of Title; Plaintiff Must Establish Independent Right to Property.
30 Nov -0001The appellant, Madhukar Venkatesh Ullal, filed a suit in the Bombay High Court seeking declaration of title and possession of a property. He claimed t...
- 92
