Search Results for "layout scheme"

Trending :

Search Results for "layout scheme"

799 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 799 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Writ Petitions Against BWSSB for Unauthorised Laying of Sewer Pipelines in Private Lands Without Acquisition. Petitioners Challenge Section 77 as Unconstitutional and Seek Compensation for Violation of Right to Property Under Article 300A.

1 Jun 2026

...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeals in Service Matter — Transfer Orders Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Transfer Policy and Lack of Reasoned Consideration of Representations. The court held that the Corporation failed to consider representations and did not demonstrate public interest, violating the Transfer Policy.

13 Nov 2025

The case involves writ appeals filed by employees of Karnataka Power Corporation Ltd. (KPCL) challenging transfer orders issued by the Corporation. Th...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SRA Termination of Developer in Slum Rehabilitation Scheme. Developer Failed to Complete Project Within Stipulated Time and Did Not Comply with Development Agreement and SRA Conditions.

12 Apr 2024

The Petitioner, Shailesh Mulchand Savla, sole proprietor of M/s. Kunal Builders & Developers, filed a Writ Petition challenging the termination of his...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Developer's Petition in Amenity Space Computation Dispute — D.P. Road Area Must Be Adjusted Against Total Amenity Space Under DCR 57(4)(c)(ii). The court held that the Municipal Corporation's refusal to sanction plans based on a misinterpretation of DCR 57(4)(c)(ii) and Note II was arbitrary and unsustainable.

5 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Atul Projects India Pvt Ltd, a developer, owned a plot of land in Mumbai and submitted development plans to the Municipal Corporation ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru Disposes of Multiple Writ Petitions Challenging Orders of Karnataka State Transport Appellate Tribunal in Motor Vehicle Matters. The Petitions Involved Disputes Over Grant of Stage Carriage Permits by Regional Transport Authorities.

22 Aug 2023

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Deemed Conveyance Order Under MOFA Due to Lack of Notice to Developer. Section 11 of MOFA Requires Notice to All Parties Before Granting Unilateral Conveyance.

5 Jun 2023

The petitioners, M/s. ACME Enterprises (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Ummedra K. Vardhan, challenged an order dated 26th November 2019 passe...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Road Widening in Pune. Acquisition under Section 126 of MRTP Act for public purpose is valid and petitioner cannot claim title over land reserved for road.

19 Apr 2023

The petitioner, Atur Park-4 Co-operative Housing Society Limited, filed a writ petition challenging the acquisition of its land for road widening in P...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Seeking Declaration That Diploma in Special Education Is Equivalent to D.Ed. General for Primary Teachers. Court Holds That State Regulations Prescribing D.Ed. General as Essential Qualification Override Central Equivalence Claims.

28 Jul 2017

The dispute arose from the State of Maharashtra's decision to absorb special teachers, previously employed under the Integrated Education Scheme for p...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Land Owners' Appeals and Quashes Land Acquisition Notification Due to Non-Implementation of Scheme Over 32 Years. Non-utilization of 88% of Acquired Land and 23-Year Delay in Compensation Deposit Render Acquisition Proceedings Void Under BDA Act.

28 Oct 2015

The land owners owned property in Sy.No.4 of Boopasandra Village, Bangalore North Taluk. The Bangalore Development Authority (BDA) issued a preliminar...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenges by Landowners in KIADB Proceedings — Preliminary Notification Under Section 28(1) of KIAD Act Not Quashed Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Section 28(2) and Section 28(4). The court held that the petitioners were guilty of delay and laches and had no locus standi to challenge the acquisition after the final notification was issued.

12 Nov 2013

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)