GULFISHA FATIMA
1 Jan 1970The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...
Search Results for "issues"
14612 result(s) found
Found 14612 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Land Title Dispute, Holds Res Judicata Not Applicable to Findings in Dismissed Suits. The State was not required to appeal findings in suits dismissed against it, and such findings do not bar the State from contesting the same issue in a related suit where a decree was passed against it.
9 Aug 2019The Supreme Court considered appeals against a High Court order that dismissed the State's appeal in a land title dispute on grounds of res judicata. ...
- 201
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Remand Order in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — District Judge Exceeded Revisional Jurisdiction by Suo Motu Raising Valuation Issue Without Pleading or Prejudice.
8 Feb 2023The appellants, as plaintiffs, filed suits before the Civil Judge Junior Division, Nashik, seeking possession of suit property and compensation/mesne ...
- 114
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Adjudicates Appeals in 1996 Rajasthan Bus Bomb Blast Case; Reiterates Importance of Fair Trial and Due Process. The Court Examines Whether Conviction of Accused No. 9 Dr. Abdul Hameed and Accused No. 12 Pappu @ Salim Complied with Constitutional Guarantees of Fair Trial and Proof Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
1 Jan 1970The case arises from a devastating bomb blast that occurred on 22 May 1996 inside a Rajasthan Roadways bus near Samleti village while it was travellin...
- 56
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Challenging the Majority Arbitral Award's Decision on Quantum of Construction Costs. Petitioner, Claimant in Development Dispute, Asserts That Majority Award Erred in Awarding Cost at Rs.775 per sq.ft. Instead of Actual Cost of Rs.7.26 Crores and Failed to Grant Interest and Costs.
3 Jun 2019The matter originated from a development agreement dated 29 October 1993 between the petitioner, Caprihans India Limited, and the respondent, Hindoost...
- 11
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. The Court held that the appellant-defendant failed to prove exclusive title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.
6 Jan 2016The dispute pertains to a suit for partition and separate possession of agricultural lands filed by the original plaintiff (respondent no.1) against t...
- 70
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses PIL Challenging State's Interpretation of Supreme Court Order Allowing Post-Deadline Transportation. The Petitioner Contends That the Supreme Court's Order Under Article 142 Permitted Only Excavation Till 15 March 2018 and Not Post-Deadline Transportation.
4 May 2018The Goa Foundation, a public interest organization, filed a writ petition in the High Court of Bombay at Goa challenging the State Government's decisi...
- 51
High Court
Karnataka High Court Allows Rebuttal Evidence in Partition Suit Where Defendants Set Up a Will — Right to Rebut Evidence Under Order 18 Rule 3 CPC Is Not Automatic but Must Be Claimed at Appropriate Stage. The court held that when the burden of proof is on the defendants to prove a Will, the plaintiffs have a right to rebut that evidence even if they had not reserved the right earlier.
24 Mar 2014The petitioners, who are the plaintiffs in a partition suit, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the trial court dated 11.07.2012 in O.S. N...
- 39
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Petition for Appointment of Arbitrator in Franchise Dispute Due to Ex-Facie Time-Barred Claims. Limitation Act, 1963 applies to Section 11(6) applications under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, and the court may refuse reference where claims are hopelessly barred by limitation.
1 Mar 2024The petitioner, M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd., a company based in Afghanistan, filed a petition under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, ...
- 564
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds NEET-UG 2024 Exam Integrity, Finds No Systemic Leak or Malpractice. Court dismisses petitions for re-test, holding that isolated irregularities do not warrant cancellation of the entire examination under Article 226 of the Constitution.
2 Aug 2024The Supreme Court of India dismissed a batch of petitions seeking cancellation and re-conduct of the NEET-UG 2024 examination, which was held on 5 May...
- 1537
