Search Results for "indefinite period"

396 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 396 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Caste-Based Intent. Appellant Alleged Victim of False Implication in Murder and Attempt to Murder Case Under Sections 302, 307, 203 IPC and Sections 3(1)(r)(s) & 3(2)(va) of SC & ST Act.

The appellant, Mangesh Chandrakant Ransing, filed a criminal appeal under Section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes (Prevention of Atr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Labour Court Award in VSS Dispute — NMR Workers Found to Have Been Coerced into Voluntary Separation Scheme. The Court confirmed reinstatement with 70% back-wages under Section 33A of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, finding no perversity in the concurrent findings of fact.

The case arose from a dispute between the General Manager, Electrical Rengali Hydro Electric Project, Orissa (appellant) and 90 NMR workers (responden...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Denial of Appointment as Stenographer Due to Preference for Ex-Serviceman. Petitioner's Selection as Junior Clerk Does Not Confer Right to Appointment to Higher Post Without Following Recruitment Rules.

The petitioner, Shirish Suresh Thatte, was appointed as a junior clerk in the District and Sessions Court, Parbhani in May 2005. In response to an adv...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Validity of MRTP Act Provisions. Court holds that Sections 49(7) and 127 of Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966 are constitutionally valid and not ultra vires Articles 14, 19(1)(g), 21, 21A, 47 and 243(w).

The petitioners, Chalisgaon Municipal Council and a resident, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the constitution...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Case — Payment to Retiring Partners Held Capital Expenditure. Amount of Rs.1,34,678 paid to retiring partners under Memorandum of Understanding is capital expenditure not deductible as revenue expenditure.

The case involves an appeal by the Commissioner of Income Tax against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. The assessee, Mandovi Hotel Pvt....