Search Results for "income tax penalty"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "income tax penalty"

553 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 553 result(s)

High Court

High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme Application -- Petitioner Entitled to Scheme Benefits Despite Not Filing Separate Appeal Against Assessment Order Under Section 5A of Income Tax Act

28 Jan 2026

The Petitioner challenged the rejection of her application under Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020 by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax -- ...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Condones Delay in Tax Appeal Filed by Assessee Due to Lack of Notice and Ex-Parte ITAT Order; Litigant Should Not Suffer for Fault of Counsel, Delay of 40 Days Condoned Under Section 260A of Income Tax Act, 1961, on Payment of Costs.

23 Jun 2025

Two Miscellaneous Civil Applications were filed before the High Court of Bombay at Goa by Neelam Ajit Phatarpekar, an assessee, and as legal heir of l...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Income Tax Search and Seizure Action Under Section 132 of the Income Tax Act, 1961. Court Holds That Formation of Reason to Believe by the Authorizing Officer Is Based on Material on Record and Not Open to Challenge Unless Malafide or No Material Exists.

10 May 2024

The petitioners, a private limited company and its directors and their relatives, challenged the search and seizure action conducted on 9th and 10th J...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Seizure Order Under Section 67(2) of CGST Act Due to Non-Compliance with Mandatory Requirements. Seizure of cash from residential premises of an employee without proper authorization and recording of reasons held invalid, cash ordered to be returned.

20 Feb 2024

The petitioners, B. Kusuma Poonacha and J K Manjunath, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India before the High C...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Revision Petition in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Remands Matter for Fresh Consideration on Merits. The Assessing Officer's reversal of input tax credit under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, was set aside due to lack of proper consideration by the Appellate Tribunal.

22 Jan 2018

The petitioner, Mukand Limited, a registered dealer under the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003, engaged in the manufacture and sale of steel produc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Issued Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act Case — Lack of Sanction Under Section 36 Renders Complaint Invalid. Court held that prior sanction of the Commissioner is mandatory for prosecution under Sections 3(1), 3(3), 3(4) r/w 36 of the Maharashtra Fire Prevention and Life Safety Measures Act, 2006, and its absence vitiates the criminal proceedings.

6 May 2013

The petitioners, seven residents of Jolly Maker I Cooperative Housing Society in Mumbai, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows State's Writ Petition in Sales Tax Appeal Maintainability Case — Right of Appeal Under Section 55(1)(c) of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 Includes State Government. The State is a 'person aggrieved' by a Commissioner's determination under Section 52 and can appeal to the Tribunal.

20 Apr 2010

The State of Maharashtra filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution challenging the decision of the Sales Tax Tribunal dated 30 June ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Reassessment Notices in Sales Tax Case Due to Lack of Reasonable Belief — Reopening Based on Mere Suspicion and Incomplete Information Held Invalid Under Section 35 of Bombay Sales Tax Act, 1959 and Rule 9A of Central Sales Tax (Bombay) Rules, 1957.

15 Apr 2010

The petitioners, Shree Venkateshwara Petro Chemicals Pvt. Ltd. and another, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India chall...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Intimations Under Section 143(1)(a) of Income Tax Act for Non-Grant of TDS Credit. The court held that TDS credit cannot be denied in summary intimation without verification of TDS certificates filed with the return.

10 Oct 2005

The petitioners, LML Ltd. and its director Sanjeev Shriya, challenged intimations issued under Section 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 for the a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — Ignorance of Law Not a Valid Excuse for Delayed Filing Under Section 272A(2). The Court held that ignorance of law cannot be a reasonable cause for failure to file statements under Section 285B of the Income Tax Act, 1961, and set aside the Tribunal's order deleting the penalty.

28 Jun 2005

The Revenue appealed against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Mumbai, which had set aside the penalty imposed on the respondent-assesse...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)