Search Results for "illegal installation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "illegal installation"

274 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 274 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Land Acquisition for Petroleum Pipeline — Public Interest in Infrastructure Project Outweighs Individual Hardship. Acquisition of land for laying a petroleum pipeline by Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. is a public purpose under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, and urgency clause under Section 17 was validly invoked.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioners, Dharampal Sharma, Vikram Auto Services, Abha Dharampal Sharma, and Dr. Vikram Dharampal Sharma, filed a writ petition under Article 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Section 34 Petition by State-Owned Oil Corporation to Set Aside Arbitral Award. Petitioner Alleges That Award Is Vitiated by Fraud Due to Non-Disclosure of Corporate Insolvency Proceedings by Respondent Joint Venture.

19 Jan 2026

The matter arose out of a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 filed by Hindustan Petroleum Corporation Ltd., a sta...

High Court

Bombay High Court Discharges Accused in CBI Case for Alleged Procurement Irregularities in SAFAR Project. Court holds that mere procedural lapses without proof of criminal intent or loss do not constitute offences under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Indian Penal Code, 1860.

9 Sep 2024

The case arises from a CBI investigation into alleged irregularities in the procurement of Digital Display Systems for the SAFAR project by the Indian...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Landlords' Appeal in Rent Control Eviction Case Due to Insufficient Evidence of Danger to Tenanted Portions. Eviction Decrees Set Aside as Municipal Demolition Notice and Other Grounds Under Sections 15 and 16 of Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999 Were Not Satisfactorily Proven.

30 Jan 2024

The dispute involved landlords appealing against a Bombay High Court judgment that invalidated eviction decrees against two tenants under the Maharash...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Considers Validity of Safety Regulation and Government Exemption Order Under Electricity Act, 2003. The Court addressed whether Regulation 116 is ultra vires, if transfer schemes protect unqualified employees, and the arbitrariness of a Government Order granting exemptions from safety qualifications.

18 Feb 2022

The dispute originated from a writ petition filed in the High Court of Kerala challenging Regulation 116 of the Central Electricity Authority (Measure...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Hears Two Regular First Appeals Under Section 96 CPC Against Common Judgment in Suits for Declaration, Injunction, Partition, and Dissolution of Partnership — Property Dispute Involving Sites in Mysore and Bangalore

10 Nov 2021

The Regular First Appeals RFA No.37/2003 and RFA No.84/2003 were filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the common j...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions Seeking Compensation for Electricity-Related Losses Against BESCOM — Petitioners Failed to Establish Negligence or Deficiency in Service. Claims for damages due to alleged electrical faults and transformer failures rejected as no evidence of negligence or breach of duty by the electricity supply company was provided.

16 Oct 2017

The judgment involves multiple writ petitions filed by individuals against the Bengaluru Electricity Supply Company (BESCOM) and others, seeking compe...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Petitions for Compensation in Electricity Supply Disputes — Petitioners Failed to Establish Negligence or Deficiency in Service. Claims for damages due to alleged electrical accidents and improper billing were rejected as the court found no statutory violation or breach of duty by BESCOM under the Electricity Act, 2003.

16 Oct 2017

The judgment pertains to multiple writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India by various individuals against the Beng...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Constitutional Validity of Section 41D of Bombay Sales Tax Act Inserted by Maharashtra Act XVI of 1995. Petitioners Challenge Retrospective Withdrawal of Sales Tax Deferral Incentives Under Package Scheme of Incentives, 1983, as Ultra Vires Constitution and Violative of Promissory Estoppel.

20 Aug 2016

...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Clarifies Tests for Determining Public Character of Temples in Dispute Over Temple Ownership. Factors Include Public Worship Rights, Contributions, and Management Consciousness; Architectural Appearance Not Decisive.

9 Sep 1969

The Supreme Court, in this appeal arising from a Bombay High Court decree, examined the criteria for distinguishing a public temple from a private one...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)