Search Results for "eye-witness identification"

320 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 320 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Arms Act Violations in Gang-Related Shooting. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of Sudhakar Kashinath Lone, a right-hand man of Arun Gavli, based on eyewitness testimony and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Salim Abdul Razak Baig, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for the murder of Sudhakar Kashinath Lone, a ri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Last Seen Theory. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Sustained as Chain of Circumstances Complete and Inconsistencies in Defence Explanation Found Fatal.

The present appeal challenges the judgment and order dated 18.12.2019 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune District in Sessions Case No. 823/...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 143, 147, 148, 149, 504 IPC and Section 135 Bombay Police Act set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the judgment of acquittal dated 31.08.1999 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Rajkot in Sessions C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal of Convict in Kidnapping and Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. The court upheld life imprisonment under Section 364A IPC for kidnapping for ransom, relying on last seen evidence and recovery of victim's belongings despite non-recovery of dead body.

The appellant, Sanjay Rajak, was convicted under Section 364A IPC for kidnapping a 5-6 year old child for ransom and sentenced to life imprisonment. T...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 8, 10, 12 of POCSO Act and Section 506 IPC set aside as victim's evidence was unreliable and medical evidence did not support sexual assault.

The appellant, Pravin Narayan Khole, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pusad in Special (Child) Case No.9/2014 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Motive and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, four individuals, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai for the murder of Ram Baburao Masal under Section 302 IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Confirmation of Death Sentence and Appeal in Familial Homicide – Accused Claims Exception Under Section 300 IPC for Grave and Sudden Provocation Based on Alleged Impotency Remarks.

The case arose from a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge-4, Solapur under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for confirm...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unlawful Assembly and Common Objection Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Conviction under Sections 302, 147, 148, 149 IPC Set Aside as Evidence Fails to Establish Membership of Unlawful Assembly or Common Object.

The case involves appeals against a conviction for murder and related offenses. The appellants were convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Tir...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dr. Rajkumar Kidnapping Case — Evidence Lacks Credibility and Corroboration. Prosecution Failed to Prove Charges Under IPC, Arms Act, and Explosive Substances Act Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Tamil Nadu, represented by the Deputy Superintendent of Police, CBCID, Coimbatore, filed a criminal appeal under Section 378(1)(b) CrPC a...