Search Results for "eye-witness credibility"

318 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 318 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal of Accused in Murder Case, Restoring Acquittal Due to Unjustified Interference by High Court. High Court's Reversal of Acquittal Under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC Set Aside as Trial Court's View Was Plausible and Not Perse Under Principles of Section 378 Cr.P.C.

The dispute arose from a criminal appeal before the Supreme Court of India, where the appellant, an accused in a murder case, challenged the High Cour...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Criminal Appeal in Murder Case by Modifying Conviction of One Accused from Section 302 to Section 304 Part II IPC. Conviction of Three Accused Under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC Confirmed Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimonies Establishing Common Intention.

The criminal appeal arose from the concurrent conviction of four accused under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Motor Accident Claim — Reduces Compensation Due to Lack of Proof of Income and Negligence. Claimants failed to establish the income of the deceased teacher and the rash and negligent driving of the offending vehicle, leading to reduction in award.

The case involves a Civil Miscellaneous Appeal filed by the Insurance Company under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, challenging the award...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Chain of Circumstances Not Established to Prove Guilt of Accused Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 03.05.2003 passed by the learned ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, acqu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Arms Act Violations in Gang-Related Shooting. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for murder of Sudhakar Kashinath Lone, a right-hand man of Arun Gavli, based on eyewitness testimony and recovery of weapon.

The appellant, Salim Abdul Razak Baig, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Mumbai, for the murder of Sudhakar Kashinath Lone, a ri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence Due to Lack of Conclusive Proof. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish chain of circumstances beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves two appeals: Criminal Appeal No.100180/2021 filed by the State of Karnataka under Section 377(1)(b) CrPC seeking enhancement of sent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC set aside as prosecutrix's testimony was unreliable and medical evidence did not support rape.

The appellant, Zabarsingh Pilya Bhilala, was convicted by the IIIrd Ad hoc Assistant Sessions Judge, Achalpur in Sessions Trial 80/1997 for offences u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Love affair disapproval leads to abduction and murder; conviction under Sections 120B, 364, 302 IPC with life imprisonment confirmed.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by Pramod Shahu, Mukesh Shivhare, and Rajkumar Wankhede against their conviction by the Sessions Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 498A and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Bhimappa S/o Mallappa Bingi, was convicted by the trial court for offences under Sections 498A and 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (...