Search Results for "distribution company"

1449 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1449 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Penalty Under Section 10(b) of CST Act for Alleged Misuse of C-Forms. The Court Examined Whether Penalty is Leviable When Goods Were Covered in Registration Certificate and There Was No Dishonest Intention.

The combined proceeding involved appeals and revision petitions against orders relating to penalty under the Central Sales Tax Act, 1956. Two dealers,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court of India: Judgment on Regulation and Approval of Genetically Modified Crops. Ensuring adherence to environmental safety, legal standards, and public health in the approval process for GM crops in India.

The Supreme Court of India concerning various writ petitions filed in public interest related to the regulation and approval of Genetically Modified (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Allows Appeal in Income Tax Case on Capital Gains Liability of Firm on Partner's Retirement. Full Bench resolves conflict under Section 45(4) of Income Tax Act, 1961 regarding liability when retiring partner receives only money for his share without distribution of assets.

The case involves an appeal under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, arising from an order dated 02.03.2006 in ITA No.1295/BANG/2004 for the a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Case — Amalgamated Company Must File Return for Pre-Amalgamation Period. Section 153A Notice Validly Issued to Transferor Company Despite Amalgamation, and Failure to File Return Attracts Penalty Under Section 276CC.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax (Central) against the order of the Delhi High Court, which had ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Writ Petition Challenging Constitutional Validity of Section 88 of Finance Act, 2004. Petitioner, a tyre manufacturer, contended that the cut-off date of 1 April 2000 for utilization of Additional Excise Duty credit is arbitrary and violates Article 14.

The petitioners, CEAT Limited, engaged in the manufacture of tyres, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Seed Inspector's Entry and Seizure Without Authorization Under Seeds Act, 1966. Entry and seizure of seeds from storage area without prior authorization under Section 14 of Seeds Act, 1966 held illegal and without jurisdiction.

The petitioner, Maharashtra Hybrid Seeds Co. (Pvt.) Ltd., is a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in the business of research, ...