Search Results for "commercial arbitration application"

953 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 953 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Loan Dispute. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Due to Respondent's Failure to Appoint Arbitrator.

The applicant, Mangal Credit and Fincorp Limited, a public limited company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, filed an application under Sect...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Commercial Dispute Over Arbitral Award Set Aside by Commercial Court. Court Restores Arbitral Award Holding That the Commercial Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence.

The case involves a commercial dispute between Navayuga Engineering Company (appellant) and Bangalore Metro Rail Corporation Limited along with other ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Single Judge's Ruling on Lack of Jurisdiction in Section 34 Petition — Seat of Arbitration Determines Exclusive Jurisdiction Under Section 2(1)(e) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arose from a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, who held that the court had no jurisdiction to entertain a petiti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Strike Off Defence in Foreign Award Enforcement Proceedings. Security Deposit Condition Not a Bar to Defend Petition on Merits Under Order 39 Rule 11 CPC and Section 49 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Pacific Basin Handymax (UK) Ltd., filed a Notice of Motion under Order 39 Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, seeking to st...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute Case — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Interim Injunction. Court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining the pledge of shares, as the shares were not proved to be held in a fiduciary capacity.

The case involves a dispute between two branches of the Arya family over shares of Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Ravi Arya and other...