Karnataka High Court Writ Petition Involving Zilla Panchayat Office Bearers. Multiple Individuals Filed Petition Against State Authorities Relating to Panchayat Raj Elections.
6 Jan 2017...
Search Results for "closing date"
935 result(s) found
Found 935 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Petitions Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute. Court Upholds Arbitral Tribunal's Findings of Fact and Rejects Challenge Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
14 Jul 2016The judgment concerns multiple arbitration petitions filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral awa...
- 89
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Appeal in Railway Level Crossing Accident Case — Joint Liability Upheld for Negligence of Railway Staff. Court affirms that keeping level crossing gate open for road traffic without warning constitutes negligence, making Railways jointly and severally liable with truck owner and insurer under the Fatal Accidents Act, 1855.
10 Aug 2023The case arises from a fatal accident on 24th January 1979, when a truck (Registration No. MHS 7493) carrying sugarcane and driven by Mohamed Amanjibh...
- 34
High Court
Bombay High Court Sets Aside Arbitral Award for Non-Consideration of Counter Claim in NSEIL Dispute. Failure to consider counter claim amounts to legal misconduct and violation of natural justice under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
18 Sep 2012The petitioner, Rajendra A. Shah (H.U.F.), a constituent, challenged an arbitral award dated 17th February 2009 passed by the Arbitral Tribunal consti...
- 10
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Stock Broker Dispute — Upholds Appellate Award Allowing Claims for Debit Balance. Client Failed to Prove Unauthorized Trades or Misappropriation of Shares; Burden of Proof Not Discharged Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
1 Oct 2012The petitioner, Shankarlal V. Keswani, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitral award ...
- 93
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Industrial Dispute Reference Under Section 10 of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Government's Satisfaction for Reference Not Open to Judicial Review on Merits.
17 Feb 2023The judgment pertains to two writ petitions filed by Harinagar Sugar Mills Ltd. and Shangrila Food Products Ltd. challenging the order of reference ma...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Under Section 37 of Arbitration Act, Restoring Arbitral Award That Declared Termination of Master Asset Purchase Agreement by Repudiation. Court Holds That Single Judge Exceeded Scope of Section 34 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting His Own View.
30 Jan 2023The appeal arises from a dispute between V Hotels Ltd (appellant) and Siddhivinayak Realties Pvt Ltd (respondent no. 1) concerning a Master Asset Purc...
- 50
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Recusal Plea in Habeas Corpus Challenge to Contempt Detention; Holds Embarrassment and Alleged Error Insufficient for Judicial Withdrawal. Non-compliance of court's directions in contempt proceedings led to detention under Articles 129 and 142, and the bench ruled that allegations of bias were unfounded and did not necessitate recusal.
1 Jan 1970The Supreme Court was seized of a criminal writ petition filed by Subrata Roy Sahara challenging an order dated 04.03.2014 passed by the same bench in...
- 46
High Court
High Court of Bombay Dismisses Appeal Against CLB Order Refusing Transfer of Company Petition. Chairman's Quasi-Judicial Order Held Amenable to Section 10F but Lacks Power to Transfer Part-Heard Matter or Constitute Special Bench.
30 Nov 2012The appeal arose from an order of the Chairman, Company Law Board (CLB) rejecting an application to transfer a partly-heard company petition from the ...
- 25
High Court
Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in International Commercial Arbitration for Violation of Natural Justice and Patent Illegality. The court found that the arbitrator relied on unproved documents and denied adequate opportunity to the petitioner, warranting setting aside of the award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.
13 Jan 2023The petitioner, Thomas Cook (India) Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arbitral a...
- 61
