Search Results for "analyst report"

232 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 232 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Life Conviction of Accused in Murder Case Based on Dying Declaration and Circumstantial Evidence. Dying Declaration of Deceased College Student Found Credible and Corroborated by Medical Evidence Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Mani @ Manikantan, was convicted by the Mahila Court, Chennai, for the murder of Sangeetha, a 19-year-old college student, under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Bribery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The appellant, Anil Meshram, a BSNL employee, was convicted by the Special Judge, Gadchiroli for demanding and accepting a bribe of Rs. 1,500 from com...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder in Circumstantial Evidence Case. Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Sufficient to Prove Guilt Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Ashok Tukaram Awachar, was convicted by the 1st Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Parbhani, for the murder of his wife, Mirabai, under S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Vijay s/o Nagu Kamble, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kandhar in Sessions Case No. 25/2011 for the offence punishable ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Appellants convicted under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC for murder, relying on last seen evidence, recovery of weapon, and motive.

The appellants, Devendra @ Bittya Bhausaheb Padale and Sunil Gulabrao Yadav, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune in Sessions Case No...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Last seen theory and recovery of dead body from appellant's flat held sufficient to prove guilt under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Sachin @ Aditya Janardan Kamble, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai at Dindoshi on 24th Decem...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Directors in Pan Masala Ban Case — No Offence Under Section 328 IPC. Pan Masala Not a 'Poison' or 'Noxious Substance' Despite Ban Under Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954.

The petitioners, Rajiv Kumar Gupta, Piyush Kumar Gupta, and Satyanarayan Gupta, were directors of Dharampal Satyapal Limited, a company manufacturing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Circumstantial Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Mohammed Yakub @ Aku Shafi Mohd. Khan, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, in Sessions Case No.378/1998 for...