Search Results for "allowable expenditure"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "allowable expenditure"

204 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 204 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Electricity Board Against MSEFC Awards Due to Limitation — Limitation Period Under Section 34 of Arbitration Act Applies to MSMED Act Awards. Delay of 120 days cannot be condoned as per Section 34(3) proviso, and no sufficient cause was shown for the delay in filing the applications to set aside the awards.

27 Aug 2018

The case involves nine commercial appeals filed by various micro and small enterprises (appellants) against the Maharashtra State Electricity Distribu...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Enhances Compensation for Land Acquisition for Power Grid, Reduces Development Deduction from 50% to 20%. Market Value Determined at Rs.260 per sq. ft. Based on Comparable Sale Deed Under Section 23 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

20 Oct 2016

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment and award dated 6.2.2016 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalko...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Case — Market Value Determination Upheld. Reference Court's award of Rs.162 per sq. ft. for acquired land for power grid is confirmed as no grounds for interference established.

20 Oct 2016

The case involves two appeals arising from a common judgment and award dated 6.2.2016 passed by the II Additional Senior Civil Judge and JMFC, Bagalko...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in Income Tax Penalty Case — No Substantial Question of Law Arises. Tribunal's concurrent findings on non-concealment of income and non-furnishing of inaccurate particulars under Section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 upheld.

25 Sep 2013

The appeal was filed by the Revenue under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore,...

19 20 21

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)