Search Results for "Vendor Not Party"

716 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 716 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Alters Conviction from Murder to Culpable Homicide in Circumstantial Evidence Case — Death Due to Sudden Quarrel, Not Premeditated Murder. Conviction under Section 302/34 IPC converted to Section 304 Part I IPC as the incident arose from a sudden fight without premeditation.

The case arises from the death of a person whose dead body was found on 3.2.1997 in the verandah of a shop. The appellants, Suresh Chandra Tiwari and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

"Supreme Court Clarifies Legislative Competence on Alcohol Regulation: Potable vs Industrial Alcohol" "A landmark judgment addressing the scope of State and Union powers on regulating alcohol under the Indian Constitution."

The Supreme Court of India revisited the legislative competence concerning the regulation of alcohol under the Constitution. The court examined whethe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 7 and 13(1)(d) read with 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 set aside as prosecution failed to prove demand and acceptance of bribe beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Kashinath Shiru Ahire, was a maintenance surveyor in the Land Record office at Sindkheda, District Dhule. He was convicted by the Speci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Allows Appeal in Railway Accident Case — Vendor Without License Entitled to Compensation. Burden of Proof Shifts to Railway to Disprove Untoward Incident Under Section 124A of Railways Act, 1989.

The appellant, Vilash s/o Rajendra Meshram, filed a claim petition before the Railway Claims Tribunal, Nagpur, seeking compensation for injuries susta...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession Based on Title — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court upholds that a co-owner can sue for possession without impleading other co-owners and that adverse possession cannot be claimed against a co-owner.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the original defendants against the concurrent decrees of the trial court and first appellate court in a su...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Property Title Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Plaintiff's title based on Hakkupatra grant upheld by both courts below; no substantial question of law arises under Section 100 CPC.

The appellant, Smt. Sumitra Bai, was the defendant in a suit for declaration of title and permanent injunction filed by the respondent-plaintiff, P. S...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Notice of Motion for Interim Relief in Specific Performance Suit Due to Non-Compliance with Order XXXIX Rule 3 CPC. Plaintiffs Failed to Make Out Prima Facie Case for Appointment of Receiver or Injunction.

The plaintiffs, M/s. Pride Associates and others, filed a suit for specific performance of an Agreement for Sale dated 4th June 2005 for a property in...