Search Results for "Seized Money"

1678 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1678 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State Appeal in Murder Case Upholding Acquittal of Accused Due to Hostile Witnesses and Insufficient Evidence. Acquittal Under Sections 302/34 IPC Confirmed as Trial Court's View Was Plausible and Not Perverse, with No Reliable Eyewitness Account of Assault.

The State of Maharashtra filed an appeal against the judgment and order of the 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, dated 22 December 1995, acquitti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder and Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302, 392, 394 read with 34 IPC set aside as sole testimony of child witness was not corroborated and identification parade was not conducted properly.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal against the conviction of the appellant-accused for offences under Sections 302, 392, 394 read with 34 of the I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Dowry Death Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Evidence of Demand for Dowry and Harassment Found Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 498A and 302 read with Section 34 of Indian Penal Code.

The State of Karnataka appealed against the judgment of acquittal passed by the Fast Track Court-III, Bengaluru Rural District, in Sessions Case No.35...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Last Seen Theory Insufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Sections 302, 364, 342 IPC.

The case arises from an incident registered as C.R. No.76 of 2005, involving the murder of a person. The appellants in Criminal Appeal No.1069 of 2006...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Confirms Death Sentence for Accused in Triple Murder Case — Circumstantial Evidence and Motive Establish Guilt. Accused Raju Birha Convicted Under Section 302 IPC for Murder of Three Persons, Death Penalty Upheld as Rarest of Rare Case.

The case pertains to the conviction of Raju Birha for the murder of three persons, Sunil Kotangale, Kailash Bahadure, and Golu @ Ashish Gaikwad, under...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder in Knife Attack Over Debt Dispute. Appellant convicted under Section 302 IPC for fatal blow with a 'Katti' on chest of deceased due to non-payment of Rs.2000 balance for auto rickshaw damage.

The appellant, Charansing @ Chnya s/o Indersing Kadewale, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nanded, for the murder of Vitthal Pawar unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Kidnapping Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Love affair disapproval leads to abduction and murder; conviction under Sections 120B, 364, 302 IPC with life imprisonment confirmed.

The case involves three criminal appeals filed by Pramod Shahu, Mukesh Shivhare, and Rajkumar Wankhede against their conviction by the Sessions Judge,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Disposes of Death Reference and Appeals Arising from 2000 Church Bomb Blast Case. Accused Allegedly part of Deendar Anjuman, charged with conspiracy under IPC Sections 120-B, 121-A, 124-A, 153-A.

On December 17, 2014, the High Court of Karnataka delivered a common judgment in Criminal RC No. 3/2008, Criminal Appeal No. 1203/2008, and Criminal A...