Search Results for "Section 20(4)"

1137 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1137 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Dismisses Arbitration Petition in Interest on Security Deposit Dispute. Contractual Bar on Interest and Non-Applicability of Section 31(7)(a) Arbitration Act Renders Claim Unsustainable; Arbitrator’s Finding on Evidence Upheld.

The dispute arose from an agreement dated 30 December 1996 between the petitioner, M/s. Mascon Multiservices & Consultants Pvt. Ltd., and the responde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Complainant's Challenge Against Discharge of Accused in Import Export Act Case. Complaints under Section 5 of Import and Export (Control) Act, 1947 were not maintainable as the Act stood repealed and complaints lacked valid sanction.

The Deputy Chief Controller of Import & Export, Mumbai, filed separate complaints against various accused before the Metropolitan Magistrate, 19th Cou...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against High Court's Quashing of Summoning Order in Abetment of Suicide Case. Magistrate's Power to Issue Summons After Closure Report Upheld, with Emphasis on Application of Mind Under Sections 202 and 204 CrPC, 1973.

The appeal arose from a High Court order quashing a Magistrate's summoning order in a case alleging abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC. The app...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Clarifies Scope of Merger Control Disclosure Obligations and Limits of CCI's Powers After Approval. The Court Emphasizes That CCI's Authority Must Be Traced to the Act and That Disclosure Must Present the Transaction in Substance.

The case arises from an appeal under Section 53T of the Competition Act, 2002, filed by Amazon.com NV Investment Holdings LLC before the Supreme Court...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appellant's Second Appeal in Housing Board Dispute — Unauthorized Construction Not Ipso Facto Nuisance but Concurrent Findings Upheld. Civil Court Has Jurisdiction Despite Section 71 Bar of Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Act, 1976 as Suit Pertains to Private Rights.

The case involves a second appeal by the original defendant No.1, Sau. Smita Mohod, against concurrent judgments and decrees passed by the Trial Court...