Search Results for "Rule 28(6)"

428 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 428 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Section 498A IPC as Constitutionally Valid but Issues Guidelines to Prevent Misuse. The court held that the provision is not unconstitutional but requires safeguards against misuse through directions on arrest, investigation, and compounding of offences.

The Supreme Court in this batch of writ petitions and appeals considered the constitutional validity of Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, w...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Permits Medical Termination Beyond 20 Weeks Under MTP Act's Section 5. Court Holds That Section 5 Not Restricted to Life-Threatening Cases, Encompasses Grave Injury to Health, and Lays Down Guidelines for Future Cases.

The Bombay High Court heard three writ petitions filed by pregnant women whose pregnancies had exceeded 20 weeks, seeking permission to undergo medica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Cancels Bail in IPC Forgery Case Due to Material Suppression and Witness Intimidation -- Appellant's Appeal Against High Court's Bail Order Upheld as Accused Concealed Multiple FIRs and Abused Liberty

The Supreme Court heard a criminal appeal against the High Court's order granting bail to Respondent No. 2 in an FIR involving offences under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State's Appeal in Sales Tax Reimbursement Dispute — Clarifies That Sales Tax on Works Contracts Is Levied on Goods Component, Not on Completed Items of Work. Clause 45.2 of GCC Does Not Apply When Tax Is on Transfer of Property in Goods Involved in Works Contract.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by the State of Orissa against the judgment of the Orissa High Court. The dispute arose from works contract...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholds Trial Court Decree for Declaration, Injunction and Possession. Court holds that plaintiff failed to prove title by adverse possession and that the suit was not barred by limitation under Article 65 of the Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves a property dispute where the appellant, Smt. Sarala Kalaghatagi, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil ...