Search Results for "Retrenchment compensation"

255 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 255 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages. Termination of workman without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal, and reinstatement with full back wages upheld.

The petitioner, M/s. Carona Ltd., challenged the judgment and order of the Labour Court, Mumbai, dated 30th September 2016, in Reference (IDA) No. 156...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Mill Challenging Order to Grant Permanency to Re-employed Clerks. Voluntary Retirement Does Not Bar Claim for Permanency for Subsequent Continuous Service Under Industrial Law.

The petitioner, Shree Ram Mills Limited, challenged an order of the Industrial Court, Mumbai, which allowed a complaint filed by the respondent union,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Tribunal Award in Retrenchment Compensation Case. ICAR and its institutes held to be 'industry' under Section 2(j) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, following precedent in Duryodhan Hiraman Ingole v. ICAR.

The petitioners, the Chairman/Director of National Bureau of Plants Genetics Resources and the National Bureau of Plants Genetics Resources, Regulatio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions of MSRTC Employees Challenging Termination Without Inquiry. Termination of daily-rated employees without compliance with Section 25F of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 and principles of natural justice is illegal.

The judgment concerns three writ petitions filed by daily-rated employees of the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenging thei...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. Termination of Traffic Manager Without Domestic Inquiry and Failure to Prove Abandonment Constitutes Unfair Labour Practice Under MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The petitioners, M/s. Universal Transport Co., challenged the orders of the Labour Court and Industrial Court which held that they had committed an un...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petitions Challenging Labour Court Orders Under Section 33C(2) Industrial Disputes Act. Employer-Employee Relationship Must Be Established Before Invoking Section 33C(2) and Cannot Be Decided as Incidental Issue.

The judgment involves two writ petitions challenging orders of the Labour Court under Section 33C(2) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947. The petitio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Back Wages for Daily Wagers. Termination of daily wage employees without compliance with Section 25-F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 held illegal and unjustified.

The present writ petition was filed by the General Manager, Government Milk Scheme, Udgir challenging the award dated 30th April 1992 passed by the La...