Search Results for "RFA"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "RFA"

345 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 345 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Property Declaration and Possession Suit — Will Construction and Execution Proved. Court holds that execution of will must be proved by examining at least one attesting witness under Section 68 of Indian Evidence Act, 1872, and that a will is not required to be registered under Section 18 of the Registration Act, 1908.

25 Oct 2018

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 17.01.2004 in O.S.No.16271/2001 on the file of the XXVIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge,...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Declaration Suit — Minor Defendants' Rights Not Properly Represented; Remands for Fresh Consideration. The trial court's decree for declaration and injunction was set aside due to failure to appoint guardian ad litem for minor defendants under Order 32 Rule 3 CPC.

10 Jul 2018

The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment a...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal by Minor Defendants in Declaration Suit — Remands for Fresh Trial Due to Inadequate Representation. The decree for declaration and permanent injunction was set aside as the minor defendants were not properly represented by their natural guardian under Order 41 Rule 1 CPC.

10 Jul 2018

The Regular First Appeal No.1484/2003 was filed by the defendants (minors represented by their mother) against the judgment and decree dated 14.08.200...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Permanent Injunction Suit — Appellant Association Not Bound by Decree as It Was Not a Party to the Suit. The suit for injunction was filed by an individual against an association, but the association was not a party to the suit, rendering the decree unenforceable against it.

19 Jun 2018

The case involves a first appeal filed by the Licensed Electrical Contractors Association of Karnataka against the judgment and decree dated 24.6.2003...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Plaint Rejection Set Aside for Non-Compliance with Order VII Rule 11 CPC. The court held that only plaint averments are relevant for rejection and limitation is a mixed question of fact.

2 Jan 2018

The appellant, as plaintiff, filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement of sale dated 26.11.1984 executed by A. Gundappa in respect of four...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Revision Petition Against Rejection of Obstruction Application in Execution Proceedings — Petitioner's Claim of Share in Decreed Property Requires Inquiry Under Order XXI Rule 97 CPC. The executing court's summary rejection of the obstruction application without proper inquiry was set aside and matter remanded for fresh consideration.

17 Apr 2017

The petitioner, Mrs. Hemalatha Nayak @ Vijaya Laxmi Shenoy, filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CP...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Partition Appeal, Remands Suit for Fresh Consideration on Issue of Joint Family Property. The trial court's decree was set aside due to improper appreciation of evidence and failure to frame proper issues regarding the nature of the suit properties.

4 Apr 2017

The appeal arises from a judgment and decree dated 30.11.2006 passed by the Principal Civil Judge (Sr.Dn.), Dharwad, in O.S.No.242/2003, decreeing the...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Rent Control Matter — Concurrent Findings on Deposit of Rent Under Section 43 of Karnataka Rent Act, 1999 Upheld. The court held that the tenant failed to establish grounds for deposit of rent under Section 43(1) and (2) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, and the concurrent findings of the courts below did not warrant interference under Section 115 of CPC.

13 Feb 2017

The case involves a revision petition filed by the tenants (petitioners) against the order dated 17.07.2013 in R.R.No.11/2013 passed by the I Addl. Di...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal by Industrial Development Board in Suit for Declaration and Injunction — Board's Failure to Prove Title and Possession Leads to Dismissal of Appeal.

26 Apr 2016

The appeal was filed by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Board (KIADB) and its officers against the judgment and decree dated 12.12.2012 pas...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Preliminary Decree in Partition Suit — Appellant Fails to Appear or Argue. Court upholds trial court's finding that plaintiff and defendant Nos.2-4 are entitled to 1/4th share each in joint family properties under Hindu Succession Act, 1956.

9 Mar 2016

The appellant, a defendant in a partition suit, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 read with Order 41 Rule 1 of the Code of Civil Procedure...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)