Search Results for "Partnership dispute"

1923 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1923 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Order XII Rule 6 CPC Application in Suit for Recovery and Possession — No Clear Admission Found in Written Statement.

The petitioner, Manoj Brijlal Kapoor (Defendant No.5), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Applications to Recall Consent Terms and Set Aside Consent Decrees in Property Disputes Between Family Members. Court Holds That Consent Terms Recorded by Counsel Are Binding on Parties and Cannot Be Challenged on Grounds of Fraud Without Proper Pleadings and Evidence.

The judgment pertains to two Notice of Motions filed by the defendants in two separate suits seeking recall and setting aside of consent terms and con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Willful Disobedience of Interim Orders in Arbitration Dispute. Court holds that orders were not sufficiently clear and specific to warrant contempt proceedings, and the remedy lies in execution.

The petitioner, Sri Sai Krishna Constructions, filed a contempt petition alleging willful disobedience of two orders passed by the Bombay High Court i...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Allows Appeal Against Acquittal in Negotiable Instruments Act Case — Presumption Under Section 139 Stands Unless Rebutted by Accused. Failure to Rebut Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Leads to Conviction Under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, a registered partnership firm, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent for d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Arbitral Tribunal's Interim Order in Arbitration Petition Under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Holds That Scope of Interference Under Section 37 Is Limited and Impugned Order Did Not Suffer From Patent Illegality or Perversity.

The petitioners, Wind World (India) Limited and others, filed an arbitration petition under Section 37 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, ...