Search Results for "Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act"

207 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 207 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 479(2) of MMC Act, 1888 — License Fee Fixation by Commissioner Upheld. The court held that the power to fix fees is not unguided and does not violate Articles 14 or 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

The petitioners, Rushabh Outdoors (a partnership firm) and Vandana Borse (proprietress of M/s. Synnovation), challenged the constitutional validity of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Substitution Application in Revenue Revision. Delay of 2 years and 8 months not sufficiently explained; Tribunal's order upheld as just and proper.

The petitioners filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 25-2-2014 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal in Revision No.175/TENB/2000. Th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Land Acquisition Compensation — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Entitlement to Compensation Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894. Claimants Failed to Establish Title or Possession Over Acquired Land, and Their Challenge Was Barred by Delay and Laches.

The petitioners, Bansrajidevi and others, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order dated 12/6/1986 p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Tenant's Petition, Sets Aside Tahsildar's Order for Possession Without Reasons Under Section 32P(g) of B.T. and A.L. Act. The court held that the Tahsildar must give reasons and conduct an enquiry before taking possession from the tenant.

The petitioners, tenants of agricultural land, challenged the order of the Tahsildar dated 19-9-1986, which took possession of the land from them and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

The importance of timeliness in filing suits and the legal barriers to pursuing claims decades after the cause of action has arisen, especially when there are clear statutory limitations like those under the Limitation Act.

The dismissal of a civil suit based on an application under Order VII Rule 11 of the Civil Procedure Code (CPC). The key points of this case revolve a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Rejection of Plaint Rejection Application in Gift Deed Cancellation Suit. Suit for Declaration that Gift Deed is Null and Void is Properly Valued Under Section 6(iv)(j) of Maharashtra Court Fees Act, 1959, Not Section 6(iv)(d).

The case involves a civil revision application filed by the defendant, Vasant Kisan Idhol, against an order of the trial court rejecting his applicati...