Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "MRTU and PULP Act"

536 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 536 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition Challenging Gratuity Payment to Terminated Employee. Forfeiture of Gratuity Under Section 4(6) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Requires Loss of Property or Moral Turpitude, Not Mere Misconduct.

7 Jul 2026

The petitioner, The Jalgaon District Central Co-operative Bank Limited, challenged an order dated 09.10.2024 passed by the Appellate Authority/Industr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition in Part in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement Upheld but Back Wages Denied. Termination without proper inquiry constituted unfair labour practice under MRTU and PULP Act, but employee's habitual absenteeism justified denial of back wages.

7 Nov 2023

The Petitioner, Dattaprasad Narayan Kulkarni, was employed as a Technical Officer with M/s. Auchtel Products Ltd. (formerly Henkel Chemicals (I) Ltd.)...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Employer's Petition in Gratuity Calculation Dispute — Service Rules Cap on Maximum Gratuity Upheld Over Payment of Gratuity Act. Employer's restriction of gratuity to 8 years in second spell due to combined service exceeding 20-month cap under Rule 84 of Service Rules was valid and not violative of Section 4 of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

10 Oct 2023

The petitioner, The Maharashtra State Co-Operative Adivashi Vikas Mahamandal Maryadit, challenged the orders of the Controlling Authority and Appellat...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions by Maharashtra State Electricity Board Challenging Industrial Court Order Granting Permanency to Contractual Employees. Employer's failure to confer permanency on telephone operators working since 1996 constitutes unfair labour practice under Item 6 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act.

4 Jan 2022

The petitioner, Maharashtra State Electricity Board (MSEB), challenged a common judgment and order of the Industrial Court, which allowed complaints f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Municipal Corporation's Petition, Quashes Stay on Second Show Cause Notice in Disciplinary Proceeding. Labour Court Exceeded Jurisdiction by Interfering at Pre-Decision Stage Under MRTU and PULP Act, 1971.

5 Dec 2015

The Nanded Waghala City Municipal Corporation (Petitioner) challenged the order dated 29.07.2015 of the Labour Court at Nanded in Complaint (ULP) No.1...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Reinstatement Denied for Failure to Prove Continuous Service. The court held that the petitioner failed to discharge the burden of proving 240 days of continuous service under Section 25F of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, and the Industrial Court's reversal of the Labour Court's order was justified.

11 Sep 2014

The petitioner, Kawadu s/o Paikaji Parke, filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Industrial Court, Yavatmal, dated 17.11.2003, which set a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Sanction for Prosecution Under Prevention of Corruption Act — Sanctioning Authority's Discretion Upheld. Sanction order under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is administrative; court cannot interfere unless perverse or based on no material.

1 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Uttam Dattatraya Kahane, filed a Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court, A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MSRTC Petition Challenging Industrial Court Order for Alternate Employment with Pay Protection. Employer's Obligation to Provide Suitable Alternate Employment Under MRTU & PULP Act Includes Pay Protection for Medically Unfit Driver.

10 Mar 2010

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation (MSRTC) challenging an order of the Industrial Court, Nagp...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employee's Petition Challenging Repatriation Order in MRTU & PULP Act Complaint. Transfer from EDP Section to Generation Side Held Not an Unfair Labour Practice as Employee Had No Right to Continue in Particular Post.

12 Jan 2010

The petitioner, Promod Singh Hanuman Singh Parihar, was employed as a Sub-Engineer/Chargeman Grade II in the Generation side of the Maharashtra State ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Industrial Court Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Employer Directed to Reinstate Employee with Back Wages. Abandonment of Service Claim Rejected as Employee Reported for Duty After Maternity Leave.

26 Apr 2006

The present petition was filed by Finlay Mills challenging an order dated 4.12.2002 passed by the Industrial Court, Bombay in Complaint (ULP) No.169 o...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)