Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "MPDA Act, 1981"

248 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 248 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in MPDA Case for Non-Application of Mind. Detention order under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981 set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's pending bail application and did not apply its mind to the necessity of detention.

15 Apr 2024

The petitioner, Niranjan Sanjay Gotarane, challenged a preventive detention order dated 29th December 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pimpr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Vital Documents. Failure to provide injury certificates and statements of injured witnesses to detenu vitiates preventive detention order under Section 3(2) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug-Offenders, Dangerous Persons, Video Pirates, Sand Smugglers and Persons engaged in Black Marketing of Essential Commodities Act, 1981.

6 Feb 2024

The petitioner, Firoz Mohammad Shaikh, challenged a detention order dated 27 September 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune under Section 3...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Stale Grounds. Single FIR and Bail Not Sufficient to Treat Detenu as Dangerous Person Affecting Public Order.

4 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Vishal Aananda Mahabal, was detained under Section 3(1) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootlegger...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Cogent Material and Illegible Documents. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detaining Authority Failed to Show Imminent Possibility of Bail and Supplied Illegible Documents, Violating Right to Effective Representation Under Article 22(5).

9 Jan 2020

The petitioner, Vishal Popat Sangle, was detained under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Successive Writ Petition Challenging Detention Order Under MPDA Act on Grounds of Res Judicata and Constructive Res Judicata. Fresh Grounds of Delay in Execution and Non-Application of Mind Held Not Maintainable as They Could Have Been Raised in Earlier Petition.

14 Mar 2016

The petitioner, Rashid @ Jagga Shaukat Hussein Sayyed, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay in Deciding Representation — Right to Make Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated. The court held that a delay of 21 days in deciding the detenu's representation without satisfactory explanation renders the detention illegal.

17 Feb 2015

The petitioner, mother of the detenu, challenged the preventive detention order passed under Section 3 of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Acti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live-Link. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Delay of 25 Days in Passing Order Not Satisfactorily Explained by Detaining Authority.

23 Jan 2012

The petitioner, Mandar Ajit Borkar, challenged his preventive detention order dated 14th October 2011 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mum...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Right to Produce Witnesses Before Advisory Board — Violation of Article 22(5) of Constitution of India. Father of Detenu Challenges Detention Order on Ground That Detenu Was Not Informed of Right to Produce and Examine Witnesses Before Advisory Board, Rendering Detention Invalid.

13 Jul 2006

The petitioner, Haripal Hiralal Lahot, father of the detenu Sandeep Haripal Lahot, filed a criminal writ petition challenging the detention order date...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Application of Mind in Grounds of Detention. The court held that failure to specify the period of detention in the grounds and non-consideration of representation by the detaining authority vitiates the preventive detention order under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders and Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

10 Jan 2006

The petitioner, wife of the detenu Rafiq Sarvar Shaikh @ Rafu, challenged the detention order dated 31/3/2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Br...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind — Failure to Consider Petitioner's Application for Documents Renders Detention Invalid. The court held that the detaining authority's failure to consider the petitioner's application dated 2.10.2004 seeking copies of documents vitiated the detention order under Section 3(2) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Slumlords, Bootleggers, Drug Offenders & Dangerous Persons Act, 1981.

17 Aug 2005

The petitioner, Ramesh Ramnath Shetty, challenged a detention order passed by the Commissioner of Police, Brihan Mumbai, on 17th September 2004 under ...

19 20 21 22 23

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)