Search Results for "Excise Commissioner"

1601 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1601 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Seizure of Vessel Under Customs Act, 1962; Seizure of Re-imported Floating Crane Valid as Exemption Notification Inapplicable When Re-import Not by Original Exporter.

The case involved a writ petition filed by Fomento Resources Private Limited and its director challenging the seizure of a floating crane, MV Maria La...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Central Excise Case on CENVAT Credit Restriction for Inputs from 100% EOU. Rule 3(6)(a)(i) of CENVAT Credit Rules, 2002 restricts credit on inputs manufactured by a 100% EOU, and reversal under Rule 3(4) does not remove the restriction.

The Commissioner of Central Excise, Raigad filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944 against the order of the Customs, Excise ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Assessee's Appeal in Modvat Credit Dispute — Capital Goods Credit Denial Set Aside. Rule 57Q of Central Excise Rules, 1944 interpreted to allow credit on capital goods used in manufacture of final products, even if not directly used in the manufacturing process.

The appellant, M/s. Reliance Industries Ltd., is engaged in the manufacture of various chemical products at its Hazira Manufacturing Complex. The comp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revenue's Appeal in Service Tax Case on Leasing of Wagons to Railways. Leasing of Wagons to Railways Constitutes 'Supply of Tangible Goods Services' Under Section 65(105)(zzzzj) of Finance Act, 1994.

The Commissioner of CGST, ST & Central Excise filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, challenging the order dated 05/04/201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Court Directs Cash Refund: Writ Petitions Grant Relief on CENVAT Credit. Judgement rules in favor of petitioners, mandates cash refund under Section 142(3) of CGST Act, 2017 for excess duty payments.

Writ Petition Outcome captures the essence of the court's decision to grant relief based on the interpretation of Section 142(3) of the CGST Act, 2017...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals in Central Excise Classification Dispute — M/s. Tien Yuan India Pvt. Ltd. v. Commissioner of Central Excise. Classification of plastic components under Chapter 39 of Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985 upheld over Chapter 84.

The appellant, M/s. Tien Yuan India Pvt. Ltd., was engaged in the manufacture of plastic components used in textile machinery. The Commissioner of Cen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Central Excise Case Due to Abatement Under Section 35G of Central Excise Act, 1944 — Settlement Under Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 Renders Proceedings Infructuous and Extinguishes Liability.

The appellant, M/s Patanjali Foods Limited (formerly Ruchi Soya Industries Ltd), filed an appeal under Section 35G of the Central Excise Act, 1944, ch...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Challenging Section 140(3)(iv) of CGST Act on Transitional Credit for Pre-GST Stock. Petitioners Argue Arbitrary Cut-Off Date Leads to Double Taxation and Discrimination.

A group of manufacturers and traders, including JCB India Limited, manufacturers of excavators and loaders, filed writ petitions before the Bombay Hig...