CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 100 OF 2012
29 Jan 2016...
Search Results for "Calcutta scheme"
958 result(s) found
Found 958 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals by States of Karnataka and Kerala in Lottery Tax Dispute — State Legislatures Have Competence to Tax Lotteries Under Entry 62 List II. Regulatory Entry 40 List I Does Not Bar State Taxation of Lotteries Organised by Other States.
23 Mar 2022The Supreme Court considered appeals by the States of Karnataka and Kerala against judgments of their respective High Courts which had struck down sta...
- 168
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Interprets Scope of Tribunal's Power Under Section 254 of Income Tax Act in Buy-Back Dividend Tax Case. The Court Re-Formulates the Question of Law to Determine Whether the Tribunal Can Direct Fresh Enquiry on Aspects Not Previously Investigated, Potentially Enhancing Tax Liability.
23 Jul 2018The appeal arose from an order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, in relation to Assessment Year 2011-12. The appellant, an Indian...
- 51
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Arbitration Application Under SARFAESI Act Between Secured Creditor and Prospective Secured Creditor Over Title Documents Dispute. The court held that a dispute between a secured creditor and an entity prevented from becoming a secured creditor due to refusal to hand over title documents is arbitrable under Section 11 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002.
6 May 2026The case involves a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, filed by Aditya Birla Housing Finance Limited (Applicant)...
- 194
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in SARFAESI Act Matter — Civil Court Has Jurisdiction to Examine Validity of Sale Notice Where Fraud or Irregularity Alleged. The court held that the bar under Section 34 of SARFAESI Act does not oust civil court jurisdiction when the challenge is based on fraud or violation of statutory provisions.
12 Aug 2022The appellants, plaintiffs in the original suit, filed a Regular First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) challenging ...
- 98
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Caveat in Execution Proceedings — Caveat Under Section 148A CPC Not Maintainable After Execution Application Is Filed. Court Holds That Assignee Decree-Holder Can Execute Decree Without Notice to Judgment-Debtor Under Order 21 Rule 16 CPC.
2 Dec 2021The petitioners, who are judgment-debtors in a pending execution application, filed a caveat under Section 148A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (...
- 87
High Court
Bombay High Court Revokes Leave Under Clause 12 of Letters Patent in Arbitration Matter — No Part of Cause of Action Arose Within Court's Territorial Jurisdiction. The court held that leave to sue cannot be granted when the entire cause of action arises outside the court's territorial limits, even if the arbitration clause is broad.
10 Oct 2013The case involves a Chamber Summons filed by Narendra Gorani (Applicant) seeking revocation of leave granted under Clause 12 of the Letters Patent to ...
- 97
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses State's Appeals in VAT Input Tax Credit Dispute — Reassessment Notices Issued Beyond Limitation Period Are Invalid. The court held that reassessment under Section 39(1) of the Karnataka Value Added Tax Act, 2003 must be completed within four years from the end of the relevant tax period, and notices issued after that period are barred by limitation.
31 Aug 2018The case involves multiple writ appeals filed by the State of Karnataka against orders of a single judge quashing reassessment notices issued under Se...
- 91
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Interprets 'Filed' in ITO Order as Termination of Proceedings Under Section 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922. The Order That a Case is 'Filed' Disposes of the Proceeding, Rendering Fresh Notice for Reassessment Valid.
3 Oct 1966The case arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1922. The Additional Income-tax Officer issued a notice under Section 34 and, a...
- 75
High Court
Bombay High Court Examines Constitutionality of National Investigation Agency Act, 2008, in Malegaon Blast Case. Petitioners Challenged Legislative Competence and Transfer of Investigation Without State Consent, Arguing Encroachment on State Police Powers.
11 Oct 2013The matter arose from two criminal writ petitions filed in the Bombay High Court challenging the constitutional validity of the National Investigation...
- 14
