Search Results for "Asset Recovery"

484 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 484 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds DRAT Order Allowing One Time Settlement in Debt Recovery Case — Interest Must Be Calculated as Per OTS Terms. The court held that the DRT erred in not giving effect to the OTS and in calculating interest beyond the OTS terms, and the DRAT correctly set aside the DRT order.

The petitioners, Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI) and India SME Asset Reconstruction Company Ltd., challenged an order dated 26th Ma...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal Order in Securitisation Application Matter. Maintainability of Appeal Under Section 18 of SARFAESI Act Against Interim Orders of Debts Recovery Tribunal Upheld.

The petitioner, Trishul Developers, a partnership firm, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order date...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Winding Up Order in Company Petition by Asset Reconstruction Company. ARCIL as assignee of debt is entitled to maintain winding up petition under Companies Act, 1956.

The appeal was filed by Horizon Flora India Limited against an order of the learned single Judge dated 16 July 2010 in Company Petition No. 189 of 200...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

NCLAT Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of CIRP Petition Due to Settlement Agreement - Mediated Settlement Bars Insolvency Proceedings Under Section 61 of IBC, 2016

The appeal was filed by Mr. Rakesh Kumar Jain, a financial creditor, under Section 61 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, against an order da...