Search Results for "5th Pay Commission"

333 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 333 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Material Inconsistencies and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376(2)(m) IPC and Section 6 read with 5 of POCSO Act set aside as medical evidence contradicted prosecution story and testimony of victim and mother had contradictions.

The appellant, Rajesh S/o Rajan Nair, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shahada, for offences under Section 376(2)(m) of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction for Rape and Aggravated Penetrative Sexual Assault Set Aside as Medical Evidence and Testimony of Victim and Mother Contained Material Contradictions.

The appellant, Rajesh S/o Rajan Nair, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Shahada, for offences under Section 376(2)(m) of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Discriminatory Cut-off Date in Pension Revision for Pre-1996 Retired Judicial Officers. Government Resolution Denying Revised Pension to Pre-1996 Retirees Violates Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Raghavendra Anantrai Mehta, a retired District and Sessions Judge who retired on 30th September 1991, filed a writ petition under Arti...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Adjudicates Appeal Against Conviction for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC. Medical Evidence did not Conclusively Establish Homicide, Leaving Possibility of Suicide and Impacting the Prosecution Case.

The appeal arose from a conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, in Sessions Case No.238 of 2007, where the three appellants were found guil...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Interim Injunction in Copyright Infringement and Passing Off Action Over Television Talent Show Format. Zee Entertainment's 'India's Best Dramebaaz' Concept Found Prima Facie Copied by Sony's 'Drama Company'.

The plaintiff, Zee Entertainment Enterprises Ltd, filed a quia timet copyright infringement and passing off action against Sony Pictures Networks Indi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Nagpur Bench Adjudicates Challenge to Declaration of Chandrapur as Dry District Under Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Order Dated 05.03.2015 and Section 139(1)(a) of the Act Challenged as Violative of Article 14 of the Constitution.

This batch of writ petitions challenged the declaration of Chandrapur as a dry district. The petitioners, holders of licenses under the Maharashtra Pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witness Testimony and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC read with Section 149 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove common object and individual overt acts beyond reasonable doubt.

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the acquittal of the respondents (original accused) by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Jalgaon, in Sessio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal of Daily Wage Workers Seeking Reinstatement Under Kalelkar Award. Workers Held Not Covered by Award but Entitled to Retrenchment Compensation Under Chapter VA of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves an appeal under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent against a judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dated 15.10.19...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Robbery Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 392, 397 IPC set aside as sole identifying witness failed to provide consistent description and no independent corroboration of recovery.

The appellant, Rakesh Harilal Kahar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge for Greater Mumbai on November 30, 2001, in Sessions Case No.250 o...