APPEAL NO. 313 OF 2015
1 Dec 2016These appeals arose from a common judgment and order dated 31st March 2015 passed by a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court in two proceedings: Suit ...
Search Results for "1925"
692 result(s) found
Found 692 result(s)
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Hears Regular First Appeals Against Trial Court Decree Declaring Will Null and Void and Granting Partition. Appellants Challenge Declaration That Will Dated 30.06.1993 Was Executed Under Suspicious Circumstances; Final Judgment Text Incomplete.
16 Aug 2019The High Court of Karnataka heard two connected regular first appeals under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and ...
- 42
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Grant of Probate in Succession Act Case — Appellants Not Impleaded as Parties in Probate Proceedings. The Court held that appellants who were not parties to the probate proceedings cannot maintain an appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, as they are not 'persons aggrieved' by the grant of probate.
17 Dec 2024The present appeal was filed under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, challenging the order dated 26.06.2023 passed by the Principal Dist...
- 83
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Step-Mother's Complaint of Criminal Breach of Trust and Cheating Against Step-Son — Holds Nominee Designation Does Not Confer Beneficial Ownership, But Dispute is Purely Civil in Nature
30 Jun 2026The petitioner, Mukund Ashok Cairae, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Proc...
- 49
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition for Revocation of Probate in Testamentary Matter — No Caveat Filed, No Caveatable Interest Shown. Court holds that a person who has not filed a caveat and has no caveatable interest cannot seek revocation of probate under Section 263 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925.
14 Dec 2016The case pertains to a petition for revocation of probate filed by Radhika Bhargava and others (petitioners) against Arjun Sahgal and others (responde...
- 121
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal Against Revocation of Probate in Succession Case — Failure to Implead All Heirs Renders Probate Voidable Under Section 263 of Indian Succession Act, 1925.
29 Nov 2024The appellant, H Srinivas Rao, filed a Miscellaneous First Appeal under Section 384 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, challenging the order dated 15...
- 205
High Court
High Court of Gujarat Allows Insurance Company's Appeal in Tractor Accident Case — Pay and Recovery Order Set Aside. The Court held that the Tribunal exceeded its jurisdiction by directing the insurer to pay and recover compensation for an unauthorized passenger in a goods vehicle, as the risk was not covered under Section 147 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.
15 Jan 2026The case involves an appeal by The New India Assurance Company Limited against the judgment and award dated 08.02.2022 passed by the Motor Accident Cl...
- 284
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Validity of Will and Limits Sale Deed in Property Inheritance Dispute. Will dated 6th May 2009 Not Revoked by Agreement as It Did Not Comply with Section 70 of Indian Succession Act, 1925, and Sale Deed Valid Only to Extent of Co-owner's Share in Undivided Property.
28 Oct 2021The dispute arose from a property inheritance conflict involving lands owned by Mangilal in Madhya Pradesh. Mangilal executed a Will on 6th May 2009, ...
- 252
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Legal Heirs to Continue Motor Accident Claim After Injured Claimant's Death — Right to Sue Survives Under Section 306 of Indian Succession Act, 1925. Legal heirs of deceased claimant permitted to prosecute claim for compensation for loss to estate, setting aside Tribunal's dismissal.
26 Mar 2015The case involves a first appeal filed by the legal heirs of an original claimant who was injured in a motor vehicle accident on 20/12/1992. The origi...
- 139
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Damages Against Shipowner and Agent Due to Lack of Privity of Contract and Failure to Prove Negligence. The court held that the plaintiffs, as endorsees of bills of lading, could not sue the shipowner for short delivery without establishing negligence or breach of contract.
19 Aug 2005The plaintiffs, Union of India and Union Potash Ltd., filed a suit against Arimar Lines Ltd. (the shipowner) and Chowgule Brothers (the agent) for dam...
- 176
