High Court of Madras Hears Civil Revision Petitions Against Eviction Orders Under Tamil Nadu Public Premises Act. Petitioners Assert Permanent Leasehold Rights Challenge Applicability of Act.
10 Apr 2026...
Search Results for "vacate suit premises"
783 result(s) found
Found 783 result(s)
High Court
Madras High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Possession Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Licensee's Obligation to Vacate. Unregistered Othi Deed Treated as License, Not Lease, Under Section 100 CPC.
29 Jan 2026The case involves a dispute over possession of a property in Paramakudi. The plaintiff, R.Rajasekaran, purchased the suit property by registered sale ...
- 78
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Amendment of Plaint After 30 Years in Property Suit — No Prejudice as Trial Not Commenced. Pre-Trial Amendment Permissible Under Order VI Rule 17 CPC Despite Delay, as No New Cause of Action Introduced.
11 Dec 2025The present writ petition arises out of a civil suit filed in 1993 by the original plaintiffs, Smt. Bertha Carvalho and Shri Ross Carvalho, against th...
- 163
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Eviction Case Based on Sub-tenancy Under Bombay Rents Act — Tenant's Partnership and Assignment Agreements Prove Unauthorized Transfer of Possession. The Court held that the tenant's execution of a partnership agreement and an assignment agreement with a third party constituted parting with possession under Section 13(1)(e) of the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates (Control) Act, 1947.
18 Mar 2025The case involves a dispute between the legal representatives of the original landlords (appellants) and the tenant (respondent) over eviction from le...
- 522
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute, Upholding High Court's Decree for Possession and Injunction. The Court held that the suit was not under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963, making the appeal competent, and rejected belated applications for amendment of written statement and additional grounds at the appellate stage.
29 Mar 2023The dispute originated from a suit filed by the plaintiff (respondent) seeking permanent injunction and later amended to include prayers for possessio...
- 245
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Appeal in Suit for Permanent Injunction — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Court holds that findings of fact recorded by courts below based on evidence cannot be disturbed in appeal under Section 96 CPC unless perverse or contrary to material on record.
18 Jan 2019The case involves a Regular First Appeal filed by the defendants (appellants) against the judgment and decree dated 30.09.2010 passed by the Senior Ci...
- 118
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Execution of Eviction Decree as Gross Abuse of Process. Decree for eviction in Civil Suit No.71 of 2008 had attained finality up to the Supreme Court, and the petitioner, not being a party, sought to obstruct execution through a second round of litigation.
29 Nov 2018The petitioner, Rajendra Ramakant Vedpathak, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders dated 17 November...
- 57
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Contempt Petition for Alleged Breach of Consent Order in Property Dispute. Court holds that undertaking to vacate premises by a specified date does not constitute an unequivocal undertaking to the court, and breach of a consent term does not automatically amount to civil contempt under the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971.
31 Oct 2018The Petitioner, Mr. Swaranjeet Singh, filed a contempt petition alleging breach of a consent order and an undertaking given to the court in Suit No.25...
- 62
High Court
Bombay High Court Holds Executors Entitled to Evict Gratuitous Licensee from Flat Bequeathed Under Will. The court ruled that the defendant, a step-grandson occupying Flat No.501 as a family member, was a gratuitous licensee and not a tenant, and the civil court had jurisdiction to entertain the suit for possession.
15 Oct 2013The suit was filed by the plaintiffs, John Francis Anthony Gonsalves and Charles Willibroad Gonsalves, who are brothers and executors of the will of t...
- 121
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Summary Judgment in Security Deposit Recovery Suit — Triable Issues Raised on Forfeiture Clause and Interest Claim. Leave and Licence Agreement's Clause 14(c) Permitting Forfeiture of Deposit for Overstay Creates Triable Issue, Precluding Summary Judgment Under Order 37 CPC.
21 Mar 2006The plaintiff, RMC Readymix (I) P.ltd, filed a summary suit under Order 37 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the defendant, Kanayo Khubcha...
- 165
