Search Results for "prior representation"

3119 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3119 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

WRIT PETITION NO. 2329 OF 2003

The petitioners, K.P. Power Private Limited and its director, filed a writ petition in 2003 before the Bombay High Court seeking a mandamus to compel ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Anti-Arbitration Injunction in Facilitation Deed Dispute. Court Holds That Arbitral Tribunal Has Competence to Decide Validity of Underlying Agreement Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The appeal arises from a commercial dispute between MSM Satellite (Singapore) Pte Ltd. (Sony) and World Sport Group (Mauritius) Limited (WSG) concerni...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Tender Award in Municipal Contract Case for Violation of Tender Conditions and Lack of Transparency. The Court held that the Corporation's decision to award the contract to a technically disqualified bidder was arbitrary and unsustainable.

The case involves a writ petition filed by Kirloskar Brothers Limited (Maharashtra Electro-mech Joint Venture) challenging the tender process conducte...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Hears Criminal Writ Petition Challenging Preventive Detention Under COFEPOSA; Grounds Include 12-Year Execution Delay and Non-Supply of Material Translations.

In 1992, the petitioner Musthafa Ahamed Dossa was named as the head of a smuggling gang in statements recorded under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Enforce Foreign Arbitral Award Under Section 50(1)(b) of Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Not Binding on Non-Signatory Respondents as They Were Not Parties to Arbitration Agreement.

The appellant, Integrated Sales Services Limited (ISSL), a Hong Kong company, entered into a Representation Agreement on 18th September 2000 with DMC ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Subjective Satisfaction and Non-Application of Mind. Detenu's Past Conduct and Single Incident Insufficient to Justify Preventive Detention Under Section 3(1) of Maharashtra Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1981.

The petitioner, Chandrakala w/o Ramlal Jadhav, challenged the detention order dated 07.12.2020 passed by the District Collector, Jalna (respondent No....