Search Results for "penal rent"

598 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 598 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Upholds Conviction in Cheque Dishonour Case — Compensation of Rs.25,75,765 Upheld. Presumption under Section 139 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 stands unless accused rebuts with probable defence.

The case arises from a criminal revision petition filed by K.M. Lakshmi Devi, proprietor of M/s Sri Varun Enterprises, challenging her conviction unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder in Hired Car Driver Stabbing Case — Circumstantial Evidence Sufficient to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. The court held that the last seen theory, recovery of weapon, and motive established the guilt of the accused under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Sandipkumar Sureshbhai Patel, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Mazharkhan Saidkhan Pathan, a driver of an Innova c...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Disposes of Writ Petitions Over Collector’s Authority to Impose Conditions on Transmission Line Project Under Indian Telegraph Act

The dispute arose from the construction of a 400 KV DC transmission line between Aurangabad and Boisar by Power Grid Corporation of India Ltd., a Gove...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR for Extortion in Property Dispute — Allegations Found to Be Civil in Nature. Court held that mere demand for money in a property transaction does not constitute extortion under Section 384 IPC when the dispute is essentially civil.

The applicants, Shaikh Mujib, Shaikh Azim, Shaikh Musa, and Shahazad, filed an application under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal in Lease Dispute, Directs Deposit of Mesne Profits at Agreed Rate. Tenant at sufferance liable to pay mesne profits at market rate from date of termination of tenancy under Order 39 Rule 10 CPC.

The appellants, original plaintiffs, claimed ownership of suit premises and alleged that the respondent-defendant was a tenant at will under an unregi...