Search Results for "lump sum payment"

380 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 380 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Recovery Order Against Retired Employee in Leave Encashment Dispute — Recovery of Mistaken Payment from Gratuity Held Unjust. Petitioner's Leave Encashment Payment Was Not Mistaken as Government Resolution Did Not Apply to Non-Teaching Staff of Social Work Colleges.

The petitioner, Prakash Suryabhanji Ninghot, was appointed as a Peon on 01.10.1982 with respondent 5-College, a 100% grant-in-aid Social Work college....

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against Acquittal in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Failure to Prove Legally Enforceable Debt. Complainant's inconsistent evidence and lack of financial capacity led to upholding of acquittal under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Vikas Gopi Bhagat, filed a criminal appeal against the judgment and order of acquittal dated 28.5.2013 passed by the Judicial Magistrat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revenue's Appeal in TDS Dispute — Payment to Non-Resident for Software Not Royalty Under Section 9(1)(vi) of Income Tax Act, 1961. Payment for shrink-wrapped software held to be for copyright article, not transfer of copyright rights, thus not taxable as royalty.

The case involves two appeals filed by the Revenue (Commissioner of Income Tax and Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax (TDS)) against the common order o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Recovery Certificate in Unfair Labour Practice Case — Compromise Terms Binding on Liquidator. Recovery Certificate for Rs.4,44,216/- upheld as compromise was validly entered into and not challenged.

The Petitioner, Adarsh Janata Sahakari Bank Ltd. and its Liquidator, challenged an order dated 16 October 1998 passed by the Industrial Court, Mumbai,...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeals in Property Partition Suit, Upholding Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Family Property Partition Decree Confirmed as No Substantial Question of Law Arises Under Section 100 CPC.

The judgment pertains to two second appeals arising from a partition suit concerning family property. The appellant in Second Appeal No.164 of 2002, B...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SICOM's Petitions Under Section 31(1)(aa) of SFC Act for Recovery of Term Loan Defaults. Financial Corporation Entitled to Enforcement of Security Interest Without Prior Adjudication of Liability.

The petitioner, SICOM Limited, a deemed State Financial Corporation under Section 46 of the State Financial Corporation Act, 1951, filed a group of pe...