Search Results for "investigation time limit"

956 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 956 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Hears Second Bail Application Under PMLA Citing Long Incarceration and Speedy Trial Rights. The Court Examines Whether Constitutional Right to Speedy Trial Can Override Section 45 PMLA Bail Restrictions When Trial Is Delayed and Accused Has Been in Custody for Prolonged Period.

The petitioner, accused No.1 in an Enforcement Case Information Report (ECIR) registered by the Enforcement Directorate (ED) for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Labour Court Award of Reinstatement with Backwages in Industrial Dispute — Employer's Challenge Dismissed for Lack of Merit. Termination of Workman Found Illegal as Domestic Inquiry Was Not Held and Employer Failed to Prove Misconduct.

The petitioner, M/s TTK Healthcare Ltd, an employer engaged in the manufacture of ready-to-eat food products, challenged the award dated 28.02.2014 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Winding Up Petition Under the Companies Act, 1956, on Grounds of Loss of Substratum and Insolvency Due to Quashing of 2G Licenses; Final Disposition Not Extracted. Allegations of Dysfunctional Board and Insolvency Form Basis of Just and Equitable Winding Up Claim.

This Company Petition was filed by Etisalat Mauritius Ltd. (Petitioner), a wholly owned subsidiary of Emirates Telecommunications Corporation, seeking...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Restricts Provisional Attachment to Disputed Amount in MVAT Act Case — Section 48(5) Constitutional Challenge Rejected. Court holds that attachment under Section 35 must be proportionate, and directs respondents to limit attachment to Rs.1.81 crores.

The petitioner, M/s. Premium Paper and Board Industries Ltd., a registered dealer under the Maharashtra Value Added Tax Act, 2002 (MVAT Act) and the C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Unexplained Delay Snapping Live Link. Preventive Detention Order Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974 Set Aside as Delay Between Last Smuggling Activity and Order Was Unexplained.

The petitioner, a friend of the detenu Joshy Mathew, challenged the detention order dated 3rd May 2004 issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Jurisdiction of Internal Complaints Committee Under POSH Act in Cross-Departmental Complaint. Court Considers Whether ICC at Aggrieved Woman's Workplace Can Proceed Against Respondent Employed Elsewhere, Focusing on Statutory Definitions and Vishaka Guidelines.

The appeal arises out of a jurisdictional challenge by Dr. Sohail Malik, a 2010 batch Indian Revenue Service officer posted as OSD, Investigation, Cen...