Search Results for "inconsistent testimony"

1703 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1703 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in SC/ST Act Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Lack of Casteist Intent. Conviction under Sections 302, 323 IPC and Sections 3(2)(v), 3(1)(x) of SC/ST Act Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Talari Naresh, was convicted by the Trial Court for the murder of Shiva Shankar, a Scheduled Caste member, under Sections 302 and 323 I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Unlawful Activities Case — Appellant Convicted for Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 120B IPC and Sections 10(a)(i), 10(a)(iv), 38(1) of UAP Act, finding no perversity in concurrent findings.

The appellant was arraigned as an accused in FIR Crime No. 1 of 2015 registered at Q Branch Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Lack of Specific Overt Acts. Conviction Under Section 302 IPC with Section 149 IPC Not Sustainable as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Based on Interested Witness Testimony and Unexplained FIR Delay.

The Supreme Court heard appeals challenging the conviction of appellants for murder under Section 302 IPC with other offences, confirmed by the High C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 302 and 342 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's evidence was inconsistent and not supported by medical or circumstantial evidence.

The case pertains to an appeal against conviction under Sections 302 and 342 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code. The appellants, Nijamuddin...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Husband in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for killing wife by strangulation and setting her on fire, relying on last seen theory, motive, and recovery of incriminating articles.

The appellant, Harish Ramesh Pulekar, was convicted by the I/c Adhoc District Judge-I, Thane in Sessions Case No.382 of 2006 for the murder of his wif...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Three Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Testimony of Interested Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Anwar Musa Sayyed, Salim Musa Sayyed, and Afsar Niyaz Sayyed, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Alibaug, for the murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Demand for Dowry and Absence of Proximate Cause of Death. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or abetment to suicide beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Annasaheb Dhondiram Dhokane, Jijabai Dhondiram Dhokane, Kumari Bharti Dhondiram Dhokane, and Sau Meera Raosaheb Dod, were convicted by...