Search Results for "impleading application"

528 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 528 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Tender Notification in Lalbagh Entry Fee Collection Case — Violation of Transparency and Level Playing Field. Fresh Tender Directed with Revised Conditions to Ensure Fair Competition Under Article 14 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Karnataka Commercial and Industrial Corporation Pvt. Ltd., a private limited company engaged in manpower services and collection of en...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Orders in Temple Land Dispute for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Implead Legal Heirs of Deceased Parties Leads to Remand for Fresh Disposal Under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

The case involves two writ petitions filed under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging orders passed by the Commissioner of Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Revision Petition in Cheque Bounce Case — Conviction Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Upheld. Presumption of Legally Enforceable Debt Under Section 139 NI Act Not Rebutted by Accused.

The petitioners, accused Nos.1 and 2, were convicted by the LVII Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Mayo Hall unit, Bengaluru in C.C.No.53439/2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging APMC Market Fee Exemption for Farmers. Exemption notification under Section 63 of Karnataka APMC Act, 1966 held valid and not violative of Article 14.

The petitioners, who are traders and commission agents in the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) yard at Tiptur, filed a Public Interest Lit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Challenge to KERC Order on Cross-Subsidy Surcharge for Open Access Industrial Consumers. Cross-Subsidy Surcharge Upheld as Valid Regulatory Measure Under Sections 42, 61, 62, 86 of Electricity Act, 2003.

The petitioner, Star Metallics and Power Private Limited, an industrial consumer of electricity, filed writ petitions under Articles 226 and 227 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Filed by Power of Attorney Holder Without Proper Authorization. Power of Attorney Holder Must Have Proper Authorization to File Complaint Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The applicant, A.C. Narayanan, was the accused in multiple complaints under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, filed by the responde...