Search Results for "forcible possession"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "forcible possession"

288 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 288 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Waqf Act Jurisdiction Dispute - Tribunal Lacks Jurisdiction For Non-Notified Properties, Civil Court Retains Authority For Property Status Determination.

28 Jan 2026

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by Appellants against Respondents, setting aside the High Court order and allowing the application under Or...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Ownership Dispute — Fails to Prove Sole Ownership and Adverse Possession. Court upholds trial court's finding that appellant failed to establish exclusive title and that suit was barred by limitation under Article 65 of Limitation Act, 1963.

3 Nov 2025

The case involves a property dispute between the appellant, Namdeo Gangaram Mandalkar (since deceased, represented by his heirs), and the respondent, ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Asset Reconstruction Company's Petition Against DRT Interim Relief in SARFAESI Act Case — Assignment of Debt by IIFL Upheld. The court set aside the DRT and DRAT orders granting ad-interim relief restraining the petitioner from taking steps in respect of secured assets under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, as the tribunals failed to consider the validity of the assignment and the balance of convenience.

18 Jan 2023

The petitioner, ASREC (India) Ltd., an Asset Reconstruction Company, challenged the order of the Debt Recovery Tribunal (DRT) dated 2 June 2022 granti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses MIDC Revision Against Restoration of Possession Under Section 6 Specific Relief Act. Suit for Possession Based on Prior Possession Maintainable Even Against Statutory Corporation Acting Under Court Orders.

6 Oct 2016

The Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation (MIDC) filed a Civil Revision Application challenging the order of the City Civil Court Judge, Mumb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Appointment of Receiver in Arbitration Dispute — Default in Loan Repayment Justifies Interim Protective Orders Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court upheld the Single Judge's order appointing a Receiver over hypothecated assets and granting protective relief pending arbitration, as the appellants admitted default of Rs.1,79,47,125.49 and failed to seek any protective orders.

9 Feb 2016

The case involves an appeal filed by Jai Hind Projects Ltd and others (appellants) against an order dated 19 November 2014 passed by a learned Single ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Binding. Court holds that first appellate court's reversal of trial court's decree was based on evidence and not perverse under Section 100 CPC.

10 Feb 2015

The appellant, original defendant, filed a second appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, challenging the judgment of the first...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit Challenging Income Tax Order for Lack of Jurisdiction Under Section 269UN of Income Tax Act, 1961. Jurisdiction of Civil Court Barred as Appropriate Authority's Order Under Chapter XXC Is Final and Conclusive.

7 Apr 2014

The plaintiff, Sasmita Investments Ltd., filed a suit in the Bombay High Court challenging an order passed by the Appropriate Authority under Chapter ...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Land Acquisition Challenges by Landowners in KIADB Proceedings — Preliminary Notification Under Section 28(1) of KIAD Act Not Quashed Despite Alleged Non-Compliance with Section 28(2) and Section 28(4). The court held that the petitioners were guilty of delay and laches and had no locus standi to challenge the acquisition after the final notification was issued.

12 Nov 2013

The case involves multiple writ petitions filed by landowners challenging the acquisition of their lands by the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal of Accused in Criminal Breach of Trust Case Due to Lack of Entrustment Proof. Alleged Misappropriation of Rs. 1,25,000/- by Cashier Not Proven Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Section 408 IPC.

15 Nov 2011

The case involves a criminal appeal filed by the original complainant, Raghunath Dhondu Vani, and the firm Bajoriya Oil Refinary, challenging the acqu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Partnership Dispute — Plaintiff Entitled to Possession of Business and Premises. Court holds that a partnership at will can be dissolved by notice and the plaintiff as sole proprietor is entitled to recover possession from the defendant who was a partner.

26 Jul 2005

The appellant, Chandrakant Kanoji Parab, filed a suit for recovery of possession of a business called M/s Ramesh Electric Works and the premises where...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)