Search Results for "detention order challenge"

673 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 673 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Supply of Documents. Failure to Furnish Copies of Relied-Upon Documents to Detenu Violates Article 22(5) and Section 8 of MPDA Act, Rendering Detention Order Invalid.

The petitioner, Rohit Uddhav Kadlaskar, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India before the Bombay High Court (Circuit Ben...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Communication of Grounds. Failure to Supply Copies of Documents Relied Upon Violates Article 22(5) of Constitution and Section 8 of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Rohit Uddhav Kadlaskar, challenged a detention order dated 10.11.2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Solapur under the Maharashtra...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Lack of Compelling Reasons and Non-Application of Mind. Preventive Detention Cannot Be Based on Single Isolated Incident Without Satisfying 'Disturbed Area' Condition Under Section 2(a-1) of MPDA Act.

The petitioner, Siddant alias Siddharth Sanjay Marathe, challenged a detention order dated 7 February 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Pune ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act Due to Non-Furnishing of Vital Documents. Failure to provide injury certificates of all injured persons in a solitary incident vitiates subjective satisfaction of detaining authority.

The petitioner, Monty Bahadur Karotiya, challenged his detention order dated 02.02.2022 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Thane City under Section...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Successive Writ Petition Challenging Detention Order Under MPDA Act on Grounds of Res Judicata and Constructive Res Judicata. Fresh Grounds of Delay in Execution and Non-Application of Mind Held Not Maintainable as They Could Have Been Raised in Earlier Petition.

The petitioner, Rashid @ Jagga Shaukat Hussein Sayyed, filed a criminal writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an or...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Delay in Disposal of Representation. Preventive Detention Order Set Aside as Detenu's Fundamental Right Under Article 22(5) Was Violated Due to Unexplained Delay in Considering Representation.

The petitioner, mother of the detenu Manoj Sansare, challenged the detention order dated 22nd September 2005 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Bri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act for Non-Consideration of Settlement Application. Preventive detention order set aside as detaining authority failed to consider detenu's pending settlement application under Customs Act and Central Excise Act before passing order.

The petitioner, brother-in-law of the detenu Charles Patrick, challenged the detention order dated 5.5.2006 passed under Section 3(1) of the Conservat...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Preventive Detention Order; Holds That Representation Made After Advisory Board’s Opinion Does Not Violate Section 7 of Preventive Detention Act, 1950. Acts Affecting Public Order Under Section 3 Must Impact the Community at Large, Not Mere Law and Order.

The petitioner, Shyamal Chakraborty, was arrested and detained under Section 3(2) of the Preventive Detention Act, 1950, by an order of the Commission...