Search Results for "Speedy Adjudication"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Speedy Adjudication"

321 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 321 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order Reopening Evidence in Possession Suit — Reopening of Evidence After Judgment Reserved Not Permissible Under Order 18 Rule 17 CPC Without Justifiable Cause.

25 Feb 2025

The petitioners, Siddappa and Lokanna, filed a suit for possession against the respondent in O.S.No.154/2016 before the Principal Civil Judge and JMFC...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Default Bail to Accused in NIA Case for Failure to File Chargesheet Within 90 Days. Section 21(4) of NIA Act, 2008 read with Section 167(2) CrPC mandates release on bail if investigation not completed within statutory period.

19 Dec 2023

The appellant, Gautam P. Navlakha, was arrested on 14.04.2020 in connection with FIR No. RC 01/2020/NIA/Mum registered by the National Investigating A...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Sole Arbitrator in Bank Dispute Over Loan Facility Breach. Arbitration Clause in Hypothecation Agreement Invoked Despite Respondent's Objections Regarding Limitation and Non-Arbitrability.

3 Mar 2023

The applicant, Mantras Green Resources Ltd., a company incorporated under the Companies Act, 1956, engaged in environmental conservation, availed a lo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Sets Aside Arbitral Award in Favour of Contractor in Postal Department Contract Dispute — Claims for Idle Labour, Machinery, and Loss of Profit Held Not Supported by Evidence and Contrary to Contract Terms. The court held that an arbitrator cannot award damages for idle resources or loss of profit without proof of deployment or anticipated profits, and such awards are perverse and patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

13 Feb 2020

The Petitioner, Union of India through the Postal Department, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challen...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Dispute — Restores Arbitral Award for Compensation for Unproductive Use of Machinery. Court Holds That High Court Exceeded Its Jurisdiction Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 by Reappreciating Evidence and Substituting Its Own View.

18 Dec 2019

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal filed by M/s. Dyna Technologies Pvt. Ltd. against the judgment of the Madras High Court, which had set aside an a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Bank's Petition in Cooperative Dispute Over Fraudulent Loan Account. Cooperative Court has jurisdiction to entertain dispute despite recovery certificate under Section 101 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960.

2 Apr 2019

The case involves a dispute between Thane Bharat Sahakari Bank Ltd (Petitioner) and Amritlal Bava (Respondent No.1) regarding a loan account. Responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Order Refusing Interim Relief in Share Dispute — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Against EGM and Share Transfer. Court held that balance of convenience did not favour restraining the holding company from exercising its voting rights and that the appellants failed to establish a strong prima facie case for the relief sought.

13 Feb 2019

The case involves a dispute between the appellants (Ravi Arya, Nakul Arya, Sushma Arya, Varun Arya, and Ravi Arya HUF) and the respondents, including ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Restrains Arbitration Against Non-Signatory Parent Company — No Arbitration Agreement Exists Between Plaintiff and Defendant No.1 Under Contract Between Subsidiary and Contractor. Court Holds That Absence of Privity of Contract and Definition of Parties in Arbitration Clause Preclude Binding Non-Signatory to Arbitration Under Section 45 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

14 Sep 2012

The plaintiff, JSW ISPAT Steel Limited, filed a suit seeking a declaration that there is no arbitration agreement between it and defendant No.1, Jeumo...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Share Dispute Case — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Interim Injunction. Court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for restraining the pledge of shares, as the shares were not proved to be held in a fiduciary capacity.

30 Nov -0001

The case involves a dispute between two branches of the Arya family over shares of Arya Iron & Steel Co. Pvt. Ltd. The appellants, Ravi Arya and other...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Due to Availability of Alternative Remedy. Guarantors and Corporate Debtor Directed to Approach Debt Recovery Tribunal Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Kishan Chhelaram Manik and Manik Engineering Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution before the ...

18 19 20 21 22

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)