Search Results for "Settlement"

5156 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 5156 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses DRI's Challenge to Settlement Commission Order in DEPB Scheme Case — No Liability for Alleged Overvaluation. Settlement Commission's finding of no fraud or misrepresentation by exporter upheld as finding of fact not open to interference under Article 226.

The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 6 March ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Examines Jurisdiction of Customs Settlement Commission Under Sections 127A and 127B of the Customs Act, 1962 in Ten Writ Petitions. Whether Settlement Commission’s Authority Extends Beyond Short Levy Due to Misclassification to Cases Involving Fraud Is the Central Question.

The High Court of Judicature at Bombay heard ten writ petitions together, all involving a common legal question concerning the jurisdiction of the Set...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Settlement Commission Order in Central Excise Duty Evasion Case. Petitioner, a 100% EOU, cleared goods to DTA without permission and duty payment, leading to demand of Rs. 33,96,718/-.

The petitioner, M/s. Viva Herba Pvt. Ltd., a 100% Export Oriented Unit (EOU) engaged in manufacturing vegetable extracts, filed a writ petition under ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Challenging Rejection of Preliminary Issue on Notice Under Section 19(2) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 — Notice Served During Settlement Period Held Invalid. Settlement Binding Until Expiry Date, Notice Cannot Terminate It Prematurely.

The petitioners, M/s. Fomento Resorts & Hotels Ltd. and its hotel establishment Cidade de Goa, challenged an order dated 13.03.2012 passed by the Indu...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Family Settlement Dispute — Upholds Validity of Pre-Emptive Right Clause. Clause requiring written concurrence of all co-sharers before sale to third party is valid and binding; High Court erred in holding it vague and void.

The dispute arose from a family settlement dated 31.03.1982 among three brothers, including the appellant Tilak Raj Bakshi (plaintiff), the first defe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Madras Considers Writ Petition Against Order of Industrial Tribunal Rejecting Plea for Award on Majority Settlement. Industrial Tribunal Found Majority Settlement Voluntary but Held It Not Binding on Non-Signatory Union Members Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The management of Caterpillar India Private Limited, a multinational manufacturing off-road vehicles, and its recognized union, Caterpillar India Priv...