Search Results for "Order XXIII"

433 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 433 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Daughters' Partition Suit: Res Judicata Bars Second Rejection Application Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Daughters as Class I heirs under Section 8 of Hindu Succession Act can maintain partition suit despite prior partition, and Section 6(5) is not a jurisdictional bar.

The appeal arises from a suit for partition filed by three daughters of a Hindu male who died intestate on 06.03.1985. The propositus was survived by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Rejection of Impleadment Application in Partition Suit -- Trial Court's Discretion Under CPC Upheld Despite 20-Year Delay in Filing

The petitioner challenged the Trial Court's order rejecting her application to implead family members as defendants in a partition suit pending since ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals Against Consent Terms Recording Satisfaction of Arbitral Award as Not Maintainable. Execution of Arbitral Award Governed by Arbitration Act, Not Commercial Courts Act; Appeals Confined to Section 37 of Arbitration Act.

The Bombay High Court dismissed three commercial appeals filed by Usha Kakade, Sanjay Kakade, and Kakade Construction Company Pvt. Ltd. against an ord...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Orders Interdicting Statutory Deemed Termination Under Section 5B of Mumbai Municipal Corporation Act. High Court Cannot Suspend Legal Fiction of Retrospective Termination for Failure to Submit Caste Validity Certificate Within Prescribed Period.

The Supreme Court considered two appeals arising from a common judgment of the Bombay High Court dated 02.04.2019, which had allowed writ petitions fi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Allows Correction of Clerical Error in MACT Judgment — Mistake in Identifying Driver as Owner of Vehicle. Section 166 Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 — Tribunal's refusal to correct error set aside; liability shifted to insurance company.

The petitioners, original respondent Nos. 1 and 2 in a Motor Accident Claim Petition, challenged an order of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Criminal Revision Petitions Challenging Framing of Charges in Multiple Cases. Court holds that at the stage of framing charges, only a prima facie case is required and not a detailed evaluation of evidence.

The judgment involves a batch of criminal revision petitions filed under Section 397 read with Section 401 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, ch...